ENNA HOME

Articles of Interest to ENNA

And to Norwalk

                                                                                                  

Click for ENNA in the News

Scroll Down for more articles

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

April 30, 2007
 

Advocate

Survey: Views of the Sound may be all wet

By Tim Stelloh
Staff Writer

April 30, 2007

Most people who live in the Long Island Sound watershed do not know what a watershed is and do not believe their behavior damages the Sound, according to a study.

The Stony Brook University Center for Survey Research and the federal Environmental Protection Agency surveyed more than 1,200 people who live in watersheds - land from which water drains into the Sound - from New London to Fairfield to the Bronx, N.Y. Residents were asked how polluted they believe the Sound is, where they think the pollution comes from and whether their behavior affects it.

Of those surveyed in Connecticut, 77 percent said they do not do anything to harm the water quality, and 61 percent said there is nothing they can do to improve it.

Yet 73 percent said that if "most" residents changed their behavior, water quality would improve.

Among the key findings was a lack of awareness about how residents affect the Sound, researchers said.

For example, 30 percent of respondents said they fertilize their lawns several times a year, and 37 percent said they wash their cars at home. Both pollute the Sound, according to the EPA's Long Island Sound Study.

Nutrients in fertilizer can suck oxygen from the Sound, causing hypoxia, and soap can wash down storm drains and end up in the Sound.

"There's a disconnect between the knowledge and understanding of what causes problems," said Mark Tedesco, director of the EPA's Long Island Sound Office. "That reveals a lot about humanity. We always think that problems are with other people."

Yet most watershed residents "overwhelmingly" support environmental protection, Tedesco said.

According to the study, 76 percent would rather see a healthy environment more than economic growth, and 73 percent agreed with the statement that "if things continue on their present course, we will soon experience a major ecological catastrophe."

Most surveyed in Connecticut did not know that storm-water runoff is one of the most harmful contributors to pollution in the Sound. Sixty-three percent said industrial plants, development, boats and sewage cause the most pollution, and 18 percent said runoff.

Sewage treatments plants are a significant contributor to hypoxia, but the problem has been curbed since the 1980s, according to a 2006 report by the Long Island Sound Study. Technological advancements allow treatment plants to limit releases of nitrogen, which causes hypoxia, the report says.

Fossil fuel power plants, pesticides and car exhaust also release toxic chemicals into the Sound, though direct chemical and airborne releases have declined significantly since 1988, the report says.

Doug Mears of Norwalk, who took part in the survey, said he did not know that storm-water runoff is harmful. He said he thought sewage and dumping are problems, but not the rain that carries pollutants as it makes its way to the Sound.

Asked whether watershed residents should worry about the health of the Sound, Mears said, "It depends if people care about how clean the water is. If people care about that, they should definitely care about this issue."

The director of the survey, Leonie Huddy, attributes the confusion to old information.

"This is outdated thinking on water pollution. Colorful examples sway public opinion if other information isn't disseminated widely," Huddy said. "It's like smoking. Look how long it took to change people's views on that. Right now, we're in a green moment. It's a good time to tell people if you want to be green, if this matters to you, you can change your behavior."

Tedesco said results of the survey likely will lead to the creation of an outreach program, though it is too soon for details.

"We wanted to better understand the perceptions of the public, to be able to say, 'What are the messages we need to be able to get out to people?' " he said. "It helps us understand what they understand and what they don't understand."

Copyright © 2007, Southern Connecticut Newspapers, Inc.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

February 25, 2007
 

Hour

Forum to eye funding of schools with property tax

By ROBERT KOCH

Hour Staff Writer

NORWALK — Paying for public education through local property taxes — a sore subject for many Norwalk taxpayers — will be the topic of a forum Monday evening at Norwalk City Hall.

"This forum, while sponsored by the Norwalk Democrats, is about a problem which transcends partisan differences in our city. Changing the state funding formula for education has long been a primary need for Norwalk," said Kenneth J. Slapin, past chairman of the Democratic Town Committee and a member of Democratic State Central Committee. "The panel will include three of the most important figures in this year's developing debate. This is for the purpose of examining the problem. We know what are needs are. This is not a rally. It's for everyone can be informed."

The forum, titled 'Will We Finally Fix The Way We Fund Our School?," is scheduled for Monday at 7:30 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall, 125 East Ave.


Scheduled to participate as panelists are state Senate President Pro Tempore Donald E. Williams Jr., D-Brooklyn; state budget Director Robert L. Genuario, a Republican who represented Norwalk in the state Senate; and Stephen T. Cassano, executive director of the Connecticut Coalition for Justice in Education Funding.

The state's Education Cost Sharing formula bases school aid for municipalities mainly on property values rather than student population, achievement and need. Local Democrats and Republicans concur that the formula leaves Norwalk and Stamford, which have relatively high property values, shortchanged compared to cities such as Bridgeport, New Haven and Hartford — even as both cities face urban challenges.

Among those planning to attend the forum is Jody Bishop-Pullan, chairwoman of the Norwalk Board of Education. She said she hopes to learn from the more about how state aid is allocated to local school districts.

"I think it will be interesting. I'd like to hear what some of the plans are. There's a lot of talk about the governor's budget and how it will affect education," Bishop-Pullan said. We need "a change in the formula so Norwalk gets as much as some of the other districts that are similar in need to us."

"Hartford, New Haven and Bridgeport get a lot of money. Because of our location and the value of our property, it seems that's we don't get as much money," she said.

Michael W. Coffey, president of the Common Council, said he will try to attend the forum.

"It's very important that the members of our state delegation, both in the house and (senate) work to get us our fair share," Coffey said. "Clearly right now, we're not getting a fair return from what we send up to Hartford.

 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

February 22, 2007
 

Hour

Ethics watchdogs must remain independent

In Tuesday's The Hour, the council president is quoted as saying "There's some discussion if the ethics board is best left in the council, or if it should be an (appointed) commission." Did we read correctly? Some discussion? I picture Jon Stewart waiting for the some to sink in. Folks, we need tons of discussion.

Some time ago city employees and appointees were asked to comment on the proposed code of ethics. It seemed to me that the code itself was not the primary issue, but the manner of its enforcement. So I did some simple research, and Googled "City Ethics Committee." Even though I deliberately looked for committees, I found zero out of 12 cities with an ethics committee formed of elected officials. Twelve out of 12 cities had formed independent ethics commissions. There are powerful reasons why this is so.

More than any other appointed body, an ethics commission needs to be trusted by the public and by appointed, elected and salaried officials. The public would naturally and logically assume that a committee of the Common Council would have a political agenda: Councilors are elected precisely because they have a political agenda, as was pointed out to me by a colleague on the ZBA.

Besides inspiring cynicism in the public, a committee of the Common Council would also cast a serious pall of anxiety over salaried and appointed officials who, while honestly pursuing their duties, occasionally find themselves at odds with a councilor's or the mayor's favorite project. The fear of retribution would inevitably impede their effectiveness. Whether these fears are justified is not the issue: The presumption of political bias is reasonably assumed.

In most cases, members of ethics commissions are chosen by elected officials, but in Tampa, Fla., the five members are appointed this way: One by the president of the University of South Florida; two by the 13th Judicial Circuit; one by the dean of Stetson Law School; and one by the mayor.


In Dallas, no member of the commission may be: (1) a city official or the spouse or domestic partner of a city official; (2) a city employee or the spouse or domestic partner of a city employee; (3) an elected public official; (4) a candidate for elected public office; (5) a person who, for compensation, represents the private interests of others before the city council; or (6) a paid campaign worker or a political consultant of a current city council member

Mr. Coffey is quoted as defending a council body because "It's hard enough to find people who can serve (as appointees)." The same Google search uncovered a useful list of organizations from which unbiased candidates are drawn in various cities: colleges, bar associations, the courts, civil service board, school boards, state officials, etc. I made an off-hand suggestion that it be staffed with pastors, priests and rabbis, which met with approval by another ZBA member — ethics is, after all, one concern of prelates. But if Mr. Coffey is right, it is far better to be without an ethics commission for lack of volunteers than to set up an ethics committee of the Common Council.

In their research, the councilors may have missed City Ethics, an online organization dedicated to ethical urban government. The following comments found at http://www.cityethics.org/mc/introduction deserve quoting:

"The fact that elected officials like to have the final say (on the decisions of an Ethics Commission) is itself a conflict of interest, because it is certainly not in the public interest to give them this final say. The more independent the ethics commission, the more it will be trusted by city residents, the less it will be used for political purposes and the more respect its decisions will be given. When an ethics system is not perceived as independent, and ethics accusations are politicized, the ethics system can actually undermine the very confidence in government it is supposed to protect."

Because of this built-in conflict of interest, we cannot rely on a committee of the Common Council to act as an ethics commission. Such a body just by its existence will do far more damage than any good a code of ethics might do.

I call on the Common Council to hold an open discussion on this issue in which public comment is invited. This could most effectively be done by holding hearings on the issue through the neighborhood associations, either individually or through the Coalition of Norwalk Neighborhood Associations. To do less is to insure public cynicism and the failure of the current effort toward better ethical standards.

The problem is not the ethical qualities of this or that collection of councilors and the mayor. It is that an ethics committee formed of elected officials is intrinsically unethical. We citizens must oppose it with all our vigor, and help in crafting a proper alternative: Namely, an effective, completely independent ethics commission.

 

Gordon Tully

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

February 8, 2007
 

Hour

Residents ask city to speed up funding to halt flooding

By ROBERT KOCH

Hour Staff Writer

NORWALK — Residents of Lockwood Lane, Buckingham and Olmstead places — and other often-underwater areas of Norwalk — urged the city's Planning Commission Wednesday night to spend capital dollars sooner, rather than later, to halt flooding in their neighborhoods.

"I'm asking on behalf of my neighbors and all flood victims in Norwalk to the fix the flooding first in your recommendations," said Diane Cece of Olmstead Place. "We respectfully ask that you approve the full amount requested for flood remediation (this year). Even if you recommend every dollar asked for this year, we will continue to flood for the next two to five years."

"For that reason, please consider recommending the total amount for the full five-year plan that is directly related to the original seven flood-study areas, and move ... this to fiscal year 2007-08," Cece said.

Cece was one of nearly two-dozen residents to speak before the Planning Commission at City Hall Wednesday night on the city's unfolding 2007-08 capital budget, which now stands at $12.1 million.

Within that, Director of Public Works Harold F. Alvord has asked for $2.7 million for 2007-08 for storm-water management projects. Of that, $650,000 is sought for permitting, engineering and design work related to fixes for Buckingham Place and Lockwood Lane; $350,000 is requested for Olmstead Place. Overall, Alvord seeks nearly $19.4 million through 2011-2012 for design and construction work related to storm-water management.

In word and photographs, residents related their flooding woes to Planning commissioners Wednesday night.

Gwendoline Street resident Margaret Peterson wore a sign — "My dreams of home ownership have been flushed down the toilet" — as she took the podium.

"In the three years I have lived in Norwalk, I have gotten flooded seven times. Each time the water has gotten higher and higher," Peterson said. "The last flood on Aug. 27 brought over two feet of stormwater and raw sewage, which filled my ... garage and crawl space." Alvord's recommendation to spend $2.7 million in fiscal year 2007-08 rests on the findings of Tighe & Bond, the engineering firm that studied seven flood-prone areas of Norwalk. While many speakers at the public hearing urged more to be spent in the first year, that may not be possible, according to Alvord. Speaking afterward, he indicated that the projects take time, from design through construction.

"It doesn't make sense to take that out-year money and push it up to 2007-08, because we couldn't spend it anyway," Alvord said. For "Buckingham/Lockwood, engineering and permitting will take at least a year."

Of the nearly 60 people attending the budget hearing in the Community Room of City Hall, nearly all were interested in flooding, based on several shows of hands asked by speakers. Two Noah's Lane residents urged the commission to restore $350,000 for flooding fixes for their neighborhood.

The Planning Commission review marks the second step in the formation of the city's annual capital budget. City departments and the Board of Education have requested nearly $28.4 million for 2007-08, which begins July 1.

City Finance Director Thomas S. Hamilton, citing rising debt service related to school renovations, and a desire to maintain the city's favorable bond rating, has recommended paring that to $12.1 million.

By contrast, the departments and school board sought nearly $30.3 million for 2006-07. The Common Council approved $11.4 million.

The Planning Commission and Mayor Richard A. Moccia have yet to weigh in this year's requests, before the Common Council adopts the final 2007-08 capital budget this spring.

While most speakers addressed flooding, several urged giving departments capital dollars to continue improvements at Cranbury and Irving Friese parks, put in new carpet and air conditioning at the Main Library, create affordable housing through the Redevelopment Agency, and establish a citywide database through the Information Technology Department.

One speaker said such a database will help the city crack down on illegal apartments.

"Illegal apartments continue to be a major concern to the Golden Hill area," said James Del Greco, president of the Golden Hill Association. " The city needs to have one common citywide database. ... Our hope is that (more money) will be put into the budget and that you all will champion a citywide database."

Walter O. Briggs, Planning Commission chairman, invited residents to submit their written concerns about the 2007-08 capital budget to the Planning and Zoning Department no later than Friday at noon.

"We will start our budget deliberations the following week," Briggs said.

_________________________________________________________________________________

February 6, 2007
 

Hour

Redevelopment Agency looking to define Wall St. historic district

By ROBERT KOCH

Hour Staff Writer

NORWALK — The Norwalk Redevelopment Agency is grilling local preservationist groups on its plan to place three dozen Wall Street-neighborhood buildings on the National Register of Historic Places.

The agency's question: Did we miss any important buildings?

"None of us at the Redevelopment Agency are experts at historic preservation. You guys are," said Munro W. Johnson, senior development project manager at the agency, speaking recently to the Norwalk Historical Commission. "We can take (your recommendations) back to our consultant. If you think there is something missing ... then we're going to go back and tweak (the boundaries)."


The proposed district, unveiled last month by Mayor Richard A. Moccia, Redevelopment Agency officials and historical commissioners, calls for registering the Wall Street Bridge and three dozen buildings in the area on the national register. Under the plan, property owners would become eligible for what Johnson described as "irresistible incentives" in the form of state and federal tax credits to renovate their properties. The credits, for example, could cover half the costs of a $50,000 renovation project, Johnson said.

A draft application shows the district covering nearly six acres and including such buildings as the Regent Theater, known as the Globe Theater, built in 1915 at 71 Wall St.; The Norwalk Savings Society, now Bank of America, built in 1922 at 48 Wall St.; the Bishop Building, built in 1935 at 64 Wall St.; and a host of other structures built between 1854 and 1955 along Wall and Commerce streets.

Architectural historian James Sexton, acting as consultant for the agency, prepared the application to place the bridge and buildings on the national register. All have features embodying distinctive characteristics of a particular era.

"The majority of the buildings in the district were constructed in the last quarter of the 19th century," Sexton wrote. "These share many characteristics: Deeply overhanging bracketed cornices; decorative masonry, often in the form of contrasting lintels or sills; and brick or brick veneer construction."

Redevelopment Agency staff have spoken to members of the Norwalk Preservation Trust about the proposed district and plan to do the same for the Norwalk Historical Society. Norwalk historical commissioners, meanwhile, expect to get back to the agency with their suggestions in about two weeks.

For now, Historical Commissioner William M. Krummel would like to see a portion of the river included in the proposed district, given its importance to Wall Street.

The agency anticipates sending its application to the state Commission on Culture and Tourism in a couple of months for review and then onward to federal government for consideration. Ultimately, Wall Street property owners would have to approve the district by a vote of at least 51 percent.

Charles L. Yost advised the agency to speak with affected property owners now.

"Educate the property owners before the state calls and says, 'It's up or down,'" Yost said.

While some property owners may have picked up on the national historic district plan when city officials unveiled it on Wall Street last month, others remain unaware.

"I don't know enough about it. I don't know all the ins and outs of it," said Michael D. McGuire, owner and redeveloper of 64 Wall St., before offering his advice to fellow property owners. "Make sure you get on board with an accountant that understands the specific tax-credit issues."

_________________________________________________________________________________

January 11, 2007
 

Hour

Veterans Park proposed as site for miniature golf

By ROBERT KOCH

Hour Staff Writer

NORWALK — Visitors to Veterans Memorial Park someday will be able to enjoy a game of miniature golf, as part of the Department of Recreation and Parks' long-range vision to boost interest in the East Norwalk park.

For Jerry Petrini, owner of My Three Sons Family Fun Center on Wall Street — the vendor recommended by the department to operate the miniature golf course — it would be a long-term dream come true.

"Before starting My Three Sons, I'd thought about a miniature golf course," Petrini said. "This came through and I thought it was a great idea. Miniature golf is just a great recreational activity. We're not putting in a carpet golf course. This is going to be heavily themed with waterfalls and lagoons."

The plan comes six months after Petrini withdrew his application to the city to install a rooftop mini-golf course at his business at 62 Wall St. Petrini described that proposal as "still kind of pending."

The city, after issuing a request for proposals, has since selected Petrini as its vendor to operate the proposed 36-hole miniature golf course at Veterans Memorial Park. On Tuesday night, Petrini and Michael Mocciae, the city's director of recreation and parks, outlined the plan to the Planning Commission.

"We're looking favorable on it. We think it is a good addition to the park and it only takes a quarter acre," said Planning Commission Chairman Walter O. Briggs afterward. "We're waiting to see a better description of it."

A miniature golf course is part of parks department's larger plan to turn the 35-acre park off Seaview Avenue into a family friendly destination. The course would be built on the east side of the park between the restrooms and the baseball area. The area is currently unused save for a service road, Mocciae said.

"It would be fully landscaped. It would enhance the park. It would be a lease agreement (with My Three Sons) where (the city) would get a percentage," Mocciae said. "We're going through a pre-review with planning. Any questions they have they'll forward to me. All said and done, by this fall, hopefully we'll break ground."

The plan has the backing of the Common Council's Recreation, Parks and Cultural Affairs Committee, according to Fred A. Bondi, committee chairman. He pointed to other elements of the larger master plan for the park, including revamping the ball fields and putting in an amphitheater. Collectively, the efforts are aimed at making Veterans Memorial Park a destination.

In fact, a shuttle might someday run from the Maritime Garage taking people to concerts and other events at Veterans Memorial Park, according to Bondi.

"We've got a 750-space garage. It's ideal for people to shuttle to the park," Bondi said.

Robert Koch covers Norwalk City Hall. He can be reached at (203) 354-1007.

_________________________________________________________________________________

December 21, 2006
 

USA Today

Cities Changing One-Way Streets Back

By Melanie Eversley, USA TODAY

(Dec. 21) -- More traffic will be coming to downtown Danville, Ill. - and that's how Danville wants it. The city of 33,000 is converting some of its longtime one-way streets back to two-way thoroughfares. City officials hope the change will make it easier for customers to reach downtown stores and shop in them.

"The driving force behind it is economic development," says city engineer David Schnelle, who expects to reprogram signals, change pavement markings and change signs by November 2007.

He says motorists tend to drive faster on one-way streets and go past their destinations, then lose time and patience backtracking.

Danville is one of hundreds of cities - from Berkeley, Calif., to Charleston, S.C. - switching one-way streets to two-way to improve commerce downtown, according to the American Planning Association in Chicago. The trend got rolling in the early 1990s and has expanded this year to bigger cities such as Miami, Dallas and Minneapolis. It's part of the reinvention of former industrial cities, which are converting empty factories into loft housing and trying to convince suburbanites that downtowns are livable.

"There's a lot of emphasis now on taming the automobile and emphasizing walking and biking. It's all part of creating a place that people want to be," says Marya Morris of the American Planning Association. "The bigger pieces are the major downtown housing booms and having things for people to do after 5."

The boom in one-way streets began with the Cold War in the 1950s, when cities planned quick routes out of town for evacuation in case of nuclear attack, says John Norquist, one of the first vocal advocates of two-way-street conversion. Norquist was mayor of Milwaukee from 1988 to 2003 and now runs the Congress for the New Urbanism, which promotes the revitalization of cities.

The growth of the suburbs contributed, too, as cities smoothed the route home from work, says Neal Hawkins, associate director for traffic operations at the Iowa State University Center for Transportation Research and Education. Now, though, there are more jobs in the suburbs, more entertainment downtown, and drivers go in all directions.

They drive less efficiently on two-way streets, according to the Thoreau Institute, an environmental advocacy group in Oregon. The slower stop-and-go traffic means cars pollute more, the institute says.

In Danville, 170 miles south of Chicago, two-way streets are meant to speed an economic revival after 15 years of plant closings left downtown streets quiet. The city set up a small-business loan program to attract stores and restaurants.

Now Danville wants to make it easier for customers to find them, especially the shops on Vermilion Street.

Marie Pribble, co-owner of the Java Hut coffee shop and cafe, looks forward to the change. "The slower people go, the more likely they are to pay attention to your business or your storefront, and the more likely they are to stop in," she says.

Norquist was one of the first mayors to promote more two-way streets. He led a campaign to convert several downtown Milwaukee streets back to two-way. He says the increased traffic means that neighborhoods flourish: "I think people started to realize that the city was more important than the road that runs through it."

Copyright 2006 USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Co. Inc. All Rights Reserved.

_________________________________________________________________________________

November, 2006

National

The High Price of Parking: Housing Costs Inflated by Minimum Requirements for Parking Spaces

Spawned by suburban sprawl in the 1950s, local requirements for the minimum of one or more parking spaces per unit have abetted car dependency and - letting builders fold the $30,000-$40,000 per slot into unit prices - pushed housing costs especially high in big cities, some of which are now eliminating or revising parking space minimums to boost transit and lower housing costs, with University of California-Los Angeles Professor Donald Shoup saying, ''In the future, we will look back at minimum parking requirements as a colossal mistake.''

Author of ''The High Cost of Free Parking'' (American Planning Association, 2005), Professor Shoup tells New York Times writer Linda Baker that with its expensive housing and cheap parking, the nation ''got it the wrong way around,'' but the change is under way. Condominiums without parking are already common in Manhattan and a few other East Coast city cores, the writer reports, but downtown Los Angeles still mandates 2.25 parking spaces for any unit, and Houston requires 1.33 spaces for a one-bedroom and 2 spaces for a three-bedroom, with a committee reconsidering these minimums along the light-rail line.

Portland, the writer continues, eliminated central city parking minimums six years ago; Seattle reduced the parking minimums for multifamily housing in three major commercial corridors last year and may eliminate them in six core districts and near light-rail stations next month; and San Francisco, which gained more downtown housing in the last few years than in the previous 20, replaced downtown minimums with a maximum of 0.75 parking space per unit.

''The city's modus operandi is 'transit first,''' stresses city planner Joshua Switzky, pointing out that now downtown builders must ''unbundle'' the price of parking from the price of a condo and adding, ''Buyers aren't obligated to buy a parking space, and developers don't have the incentive to build spaces they can't sell.''

In downtown Seattle's neighborhood of Belltown, where the average condo has 1.5 parking spaces, the 251-condo Moda project, now under way, includes 83 units without parking, 125 with access to permit parking, and only 43 with assigned spaces, each priced at about $30,000 more than the others, and all 251 sold within a week.

The same happened with 24 condos without parking in the 261-unit Civic project under construction near bus and light-rail stops six blocks from downtown Portland. The Gerding/Edlen Development Company ''decided to test the water and see if there was a market for units without parking spaces,'' says project manager Tom Cody. ''We're always looking for ways to promote smart growth.'' -- New York Times  11/12/2006

Click here to view the source article.
Click here to view the source publication.


This web site is a subset of http://www.sustainable.org, developed
and maintained by the Sustainable Communities Network (SCN),
and supported with funding from the US EPA.

Copyright © 1996-2006. All Rights Reserved.

_________________________________________________________________________________

November 12, 2006

 

 

National Perspectives

No Parking: Condos Leave Out Cars

Lisa Bauso for The New York Times

FEWER CARS There are no parking spaces for the condos bought by Annemieke Clark and Daniel Pasley in downtown Portland, Ore.

Published: November 12, 2006

PORTLAND, Ore.

 
Peter Yates for The New York Times

There are no parking spaces for Mary Stonecypher-Howell at the Moda condominiums in Seattle.

Peter DaSilva for The New York Times

In San Francisco, One Rincon Hill allows for one space per unit.

ANNEMIEKE CLARK and her boyfriend, Daniel Pasley, do not spend a lot of time driving. Ms. Clark, a 29-year-old nursing student at Oregon Health and Science University, takes the bus to school. Her boyfriend is a “crazy bike rider,” she said.

So when they decided to buy their first home last winter, they chose a one-bedroom unit in the Civic, one of the first new developments in Portland to market condominiums without parking spaces.

Ms. Clark said they bought the $175,000 condo, which will be ready next summer, because “it was absolutely the cheapest one selling.” Mr. Pasley also hoped a unit without parking would inspire Ms. Clark to sell her 1992 Subaru.

“So, part of it was idealism — that we would get rid of the car,” Ms. Clark said.

Although condominiums without parking are common in Manhattan and the downtowns of a few other East Coast cities, they are the exception to the rule in most of the country. In fact, almost all local governments require developers to provide a minimum number of parking spaces for each unit — and to fold the cost of the space into the housing price.

The exact regulations, which are intended to prevent clogged streets and provide sufficient parking, vary by city. Houston’s code requires a minimum of 1.33 parking spaces for a one-bedroom and 2 spaces for a three-bedroom. Downtown Los Angeles mandates 2.25 parking spaces per unit, regardless of size.

Today, city planners around the country are trying to change or eliminate these standards, opting to promote mass transit and find a way to lower housing costs.

Minimum parking requirements became popular in the 1950s with the growth of suburbia, said Donald Shoup, a professor of urban planning at the University of California at Los Angeles and the author of “The High Cost of Free Parking” (American Planning Association, 2005). “They spread like wildfire,” he said.

But in the 21st century, skyrocketing housing prices and the move toward high-density urban development are bringing scrutiny to the ways in which cities and developers manage the relationship between parking and residential real estate. Once a tool of government, parking requirements are increasingly driven by the market.

Last year, for example, Seattle reduced parking requirements for multifamily housing in three of the city’s major commercial corridors. Next month, the City Council will vote on a proposal to eliminate minimum parking requirements in Seattle’s six core urban districts and near light-rail stations. In June, San Francisco replaced minimum requirements downtown with maximum standards allowing no more than 0.75 parking spaces per unit. In Portland, where central city parking minimums were eliminated six years ago, developers are breaking ground on projects with restricted parking.

“In the future,” Dr. Shoup said, “we will look back at minimum parking requirements as a colossal mistake. Change will be slow, but it’s happening now.”

The Civic, a 261-unit project, includes 24 condos without parking. The building is six blocks from downtown and near a major bus and light-rail line, and will offer residents a rental-car-sharing arrangement.

“We’re always looking for ways to promote smart growth,” said Tom Cody, a project manager of the Gerding/Edlen Development Company, which developed the Civic. “We decided to test the water and see if there was a market for units without parking spaces.” The 24 condos sold out, he said.

In San Francisco, more downtown housing has been approved over the last few years than in the last 20 years combined, said Joshua Switzky, a city planner. The booming real estate market there inspired local officials to revoke minimum-parking requirements in the central core, Mr. Switzky said. “The city’s modus operandi is ‘transit first,’ ” he said. “Everyone recognized the existing rules didn’t match the policy.”

Under San Francisco’s new parking maximums, downtown developers are also required to “unbundle” the price of parking from the price of the condo. “Buyers aren’t obligated to buy a parking space, and developers don’t have the incentive to build spaces they can’t sell,” Mr. Switzky said.

Sustainable development is not the only factor driving changes to parking standards. “We talk about affordable housing as the most critical thing facing cities and the nation,” Mr. Cody said. “But we never talk about the costs of the automobile.” Since individual parking spaces cost about $40,000, reducing or eliminating parking is an effective way to lower housing prices, he said.

At the Moda condominiums, a development under construction in Seattle, only 43 out of 251 units have assigned parking. Eighty-three units have no parking and the remainder have access to a permit parking system. The building is in the downtown Belltown neighborhood, where the average condo has one and a half parking spaces.

“I wanted the least expensive unit,” said Mary Stonecypher-Howell, a computer database specialist who bought a Moda studio without parking for $170,000. Ms. Stonecypher-Howell said it was the only downtown condo she could find for less than $200,000. “In the city, it’s simpler not to have a car,” she said. Moda units with parking cost about $30,000 more than units without.

Lenders traditionally balk at financing projects without parking, said David Hoy, who developed the Moda condos. The concern is that they would be difficult to resell. “But in a high-density urban environment, there’s a strong demand and a shortage of supply,” Mr. Hoy said. Moda, which is financed by United Commercial Bank, sold out in less than a week, he said.

Other cities are also reconsidering parking standards. In Houston, for example, a committee is reviewing parking minimums along the light-rail line, according to Suzy Hartgrove, a spokeswoman for the city’s planning and development department.

But not everybody is enthusiastic about the piecemeal changes taking place around the country, especially because often-arcane parking codes vary from district to district and city to suburb.

In the Rincon Hill neighborhood of San Francisco, where the new luxury tower One Rincon Hill is selling for $1,000 a square foot, parking standards allow a maximum of one space per unit. Just a few blocks away, downtown requirements undercut that figure by a quarter, making One Rincon Hill more attractive to buyers with cars.

“It gives them a marketing advantage,” said Victor Gonzalez, director of development for Monahan Pacific, a local company that has built condo properties downtown. “You’d be killed if you tried to do a project in the suburbs without parking,” he added.

Others point to the free-market parking situation in Manhattan, where monthly rates now exceed $500 a month.

Planners are undeterred. In the United States, “housing is expensive and parking is cheap,” Dr. Shoup said. “We’ve got it the wrong way around.”

_________________________________________________________________________________

October 25, 2006

 

Hour

Report: No big-box stores for Westport Ave.

By ROBERT KOCH

Hour Staff Writer

NORWALK — Fewer curb cuts, more trees and street lamps, underground utilities and curtailing the possibility of more big-box stores are several recommendations within a draft plan to be presented to The Main & Westport Avenue Corridor Study Advisory Committee Thursday night.

"I think it's a well-balanced plan. It gives us lots of opportunities to work with. We look forward to getting some public input after Thursday's public gathering," said Frances DiMeglio, advisory committee co-chairwoman and a member of the city's Planning Commission.

On Thursday night, Phillips Preiss Shapiro, a planning and real-estate consulting firm based in New York City, will present to DiMeglio's committee — and to the public — its draft plan for the Main and Westport avenue corridor, which stretches from the Merritt Parkway to the Westport border.

The presentation is scheduled for Thursday at 7:30 p.m. in the Common Council chambers of Norwalk City Hall, 125 East Ave. Committee members and the public may ask questions afterward.

The "mini master plan" eventually will be worked into the city's updated Master Plan of Conservation & Development. That larger plan, now being assembled, will serve as a blueprint for zoning regulations.

The Main & Westport Avenue draft plan addresses land use, transportation, urban design, zoning and economic development policy changes that "could be used, either together or separately, to affect the corridors over the next 10 years," according to Phillips Preiss Shapiro.

The 105-page plan includes maps of recommended traffic improvements and breaks up the corridor into six sections with specific recommendations for each.

"It is recommended that big box retail development be limited to the northern end of Main Avenue, where the Stop & Shop is now located," reads the land-use recommendation for the northernmost section. "This location is logical for this type of development, because it is next to a large employment and residential center, has excellent highway access, and has the potential for improved transit connections."

For central Main Street and Main Avenue, the plan recommends that retail stores be limited to 10,000 square feet and that drive-through facilities be prohibited. For lower Main Street and North Avenue, Phillips Preiss Shapiro recommends limiting individual retail stores to 5,000 square feet.

Along Westport Avenue, approaching the Westport border, the plan recommends against big-box stores. Near Stew Leonard's, it recommends no land-use changes as there are "no apparent soft sites ripe for development."

"What they're recommending is that (zoning regulations) try to preserve the smaller retailers on Main Street and also Westport Avenue," said Michael E. Wrinn, assistant planning and zoning director for the city. "I think (the recommendations) are in keeping with what we're hearing."

In addition to land-use and zoning recommendations, the draft plan includes urban design recommendations. They include large storefront windows, awnings and overhangs, broken and textured facades and other features aimed at creating an "interesting walking environment for pedestrians."

The plan recommends placing parking behind rather than in front of storefronts, limiting the number of curb cuts into which traffic enters and exits, and adding street trees and street lamps.

For lower Main Street and North Avenue, the plan recommends village district zoning to "give the city additional control" over site-plan approval. For lower Main Street — and possibly upper Main Street and Main Avenue — the plan recommends a special services district.

In special service districts, municipalities can enact legislation allowing property owners to impose a higher tax rate in exchange for special services, such as extra street cleaning, added police protection and marketing. Stamford's downtown is a special services district. Norwalk currently has no such district.

Former Mayor Alex Knopp launched the Main & Westport Avenue Corridor Study Advisory Committee. The initiative followed his administration's pattern of turning to outside consultants for areas of the city that the mayor says are subject to development pressures and therefore need added attention.

"In particular, I want to avoid the traffic congestion and over-concentration of large-scale retail on Westport Avenue that occurred in the past on Connecticut Avenue," said Knopp, speaking last year.

_________________________________________________________________________________

October 19, 2006

 

Hour

New committee reviewing Head-of-the-Harbor plan

By ROBERT KOCH

Hour Staff Writer

NORWALK — The newly formed Wall Street Parcel Three Land Disposition Agreement Review Committee received Tuesday a draft version of the agreement that will guide M.F. DiScala & Co. in reshaping of the Head-of-the-Harbor portion of Wall Street.

"We are working on what terms would be acceptable, such as if there are any infrastructure costs to be borne by the city, the size and scope of the project, the responsibilities with regards to public works," said Michael W. Coffey, Common Council president and co-chairman of the new committee. "We're hoping that this (committee) helps us ... cut through red tape while looking at the projects. Instead of just elongating the process and taking many years, we're hoping we can reduce some of the time frame."

M.F. DiScala's plan calls for 20 townhouses in four-story buildings facing Main Street; retail, restaurants and 61 residential units in a six-story building on Wall and High streets; and a 294-space parking structure. Between Smith Street and the Norwalk River will rise a five- to seven-story condominium building with 80 units and 156 parking spaces. A 15-foot-wide public boardwalk is planned for along the river.

Land-disposition agreements — legal documents spelling out each party's responsibilities on land use, roadwork, public parking, affordable housing and other issues — are part of the redevelopment process.

Redevelopment Agency Executive Director Timothy T. Sheehan recommended formation of the ad hoc committee to address council members concerns about not having a large enough role in the approval process. That process sends draft land-disposition agreements through the Redevelopment Commission, the Planning Commission, the council's Planning Committee, and lastly the full council for approval. The new committee will allow representatives of each body to review the unfolding agreements.

Co-chairing the review committee are Mayor Richard A. Moccia and Coffey. Also on the committee are council Majority Leader Carvin J. Hilliard; Minority Leader Douglas E. Hempstead; Planning Commission Chairman Walter O. Briggs; Redevelopment Commission Chairman Paul L. Jones, and commissioner Emil Albanese. Sheehan and Redevelopment Agency Assistant Director John L. Burritt Jr. are staff.

"The reason for the joint committee is to streamline (the agreement) through the process," Jones said. "It's our mission to be completed (with the Wall Street agreement) in five meetings. We are trying to stay on schedule each week. We hope to have it up (to the council) in six or seven weeks."

From there, the project would go through site-plan and other review, and onward to construction.

The committee's work will not end with the Head-of-the-Harbor land-disposition agreement. Next to be reviewed: A land-disposition agreement between the city and POKO Partners LLC.

POKO Partners, the chosen developer for the Isaacs Street portion of the Wall Street neighborhood, plans to reshape the area bounded by West Avenue and Wall, Leonard and Isaacs streets with 349 housing units; 93,000 square feet of public open space; 45,500 square feet of retail; and 845 public and private parking spaces. The plan also calls for restoring the former Norwalk Theater.

_________________________________________________________________________________

October 18, 2006

 

Hour

Official: Stopping flooding will cost millions of dollars

By ROBERT KOCH

Hour Staff Writer

NORWALK — Conservation commissioners received Tuesday night an engineer's assessment of flooding problems in Norwalk and what is needed to fix them.

Director of Public Works Harold F. Alvord unrolled a map of 16 flood-prone areas of the city. The causes range from undersized or clogged storm-water pipes to too much rainfall. And correcting them will require additional public works staffing, equipment and dollars, according to Alvord.

"We've identified areas where there are blockages or partial blockages," Alvord said. "Our storm-drain system you should clean every year, because you don't know who's throwing frozen turkeys in there and bowling balls. And then you've got the sand off the streets."

"We need operating budget dollars to do the cleaning and hopefully add to that vacuum trucks" in the capital budget, Alvord said.

The Conservation Commission, which is responsible for reviewing development applications for properties that include or are located near ponds and other wetlands, called the meeting to "review flooding and drainage issues within the city," after East Norwalk residents last month urged them to reject a condominium development for the former Fitch School property on Strawberry Hill Avenue.

Commissioners approved the storm-water management plan for the condominium development, which they concurred will reduce storm-water runoff from the site. At the same time, however, they called for a special meeting to address flooding problems citywide.

Councilman Kevin M. Poruban and eight residents who've experience flooding problems — including Olmstead Place resident Diane Cece and Buckingham Place resident Lisa Rivieccio — attended the special meeting at City Hall Tuesday night.

"There's just so much need in terms of fixing infrastructure in Norwalk," Rivieccio said. "The Department of Public Works ... is trying to catch up with years of neglect. You're talking millions of dollars to brings back quality-of-life to residents."

Alvord compared undersized storm-water pipes and clogged drains to neglected roads and outdated traffic signals in the city. The city has 200 miles of storm-water pipes, he said.

In equipment, the public works department currently has three operational vacuum trucks to clean clogged storm-water drains and pipes, Alvord said.

"We hope to get a fleet of eight trucks, which should give us the ability to maintain the system," Alvord said.

In July, the city commissioned Tighe & Bond, a Westfield, Mass., engineering firm to study eight flood-prone areas of the city, and lay out possible solutions along with costs. Alvord said preliminary results of that study are due back later this month. The public works department hopes to have dollars placed in the city's 2007-08 capital budget to fix the flooding problems — and then study other areas.

"But that's only going to do a few areas of the city," Alvord said.

Anne Cagnina, Conservation Commission chairwoman, welcomed the map and presentation as needed information for commissioners, as they review future development applications.

"We needed to be informed. When any applicant comes in, look at the impacts of the projects," Cagnina said.

_________________________________________________________________________________

October 15, 2006

 

Advocate

Giving affordable housing a boost

By Brian Lockhart
Staff Writer

October 15, 2006

NORWALK -- The zoning department is circulating new regulations that would force developers to build affordable housing units in some business and residentially zoned neighborhoods.

The draft proposal, issued in late summer and altered in recent weeks by the Zoning Commission, is expected to go before a public hearing next month, Planning and Zoning Director Michael Greene said.

"It's evolving," he said.

The proposal also is being reviewed by the city's Planning Commission. On Friday, the Greater Norwalk Chamber of Commerce established an ad-hoc committee to weigh in on the plan.

"They will report to the board at our November meeting," Chamber President Edward Musante said. "Generally speaking, we have been" supportive of affordable housing.

He added: "Now you have a specific proposal and the specifics need to be looked at. . . . Is it written in a way that's productive, fair and equitable?"

The so-called inclusionary zoning or workforce housing policy was crafted over several months earlier this year by a liaison committee of the planning and zoning commissions.

The draft was forwarded to the Zoning Commission for initial review in August -- more than four years after former Democratic Mayor Alex Knopp's administration first began touting the need for such regulations.

But the administration never moved forward, relying instead on an informal process of negotiating with various developers.

As first proposed, the regulations would have made at least 15 percent, and in some cases 20 percent, of the units in new, multifamily developments affordably priced.

Greene said that number has since been decreased to 10 percent, the level used in many other cities.

The units would be affordable for households earning less than 80 percent of the state median income, or $65,000 for a family of four.

"To be perfectly honest, the Zoning Commission has met with various developers and with representatives of the Chamber (of Commerce) and they've been (advocating) a simpler version" with more modest requirements, Greene said.

"Everyone's saying, 'That's what we should do first and over time fine tune it,' " he said.

The regulations still will allow developers to increase the density of projects to accommodate the affordable units; transfer the requirement to another development site; or pay a fee in lieu of housing to a special fund for other affordable housing projects.

The fee is currently calculated at $218,700 per unit, Greene said.

He said another change to the initial draft proposal is the inclusion of an equity-sharing program.

Often affordably priced condominium units are assigned deed restrictions to keep them from reverting to market-rate units when they are sold.

Greene said the equity-sharing program would allow developers to instead build non-deed restricted units that the owners could later sell at market-rate prices, splitting any profit with the city's housing fund.

"So you do lose the unit as affordable, but the person has built up equity to move to a market-rate unit and the city has built up equity to build more affordable housing," Greene said.

Robert Keyes, chairman of the Zoning Commission, said the draft regulations have been revised to be more palatable to officials who do not support mandatory affordable housing.

Republican Mayor Richard Moccia and at least three zoning commissioners -- unaffiliated voter Larry Bentley, Republican James White and Independent Andrea Light -- have said they oppose mandatory regulations.

"Ultimately, we're not trying to make a regulation that's a hammer to developers. We want to make it so this is something they can work with," Keyes, a Democrat, said. "I'm very excited about this. Hopefully, we get it passed and approved."

Light said while she appreciates "efforts at compromise" like the equity-sharing proposal, she probably will not vote for the regulations.

"I have real concerns about the impact on our operating budget," Light said. "When you have two identical units -- one that's deed-restricted, one that's not -- the deed restricted unit has a lesser assessed value so you're paying less in taxes. That shifts the burden to. . . the middle-class population."

Proponents of inclusionary zoning argue since multifamily housing construction is increasing in Norwalk, the regulations are needed to help the city continue to meet the state guideline of having at least 10 percent of its housing stock affordably priced.

Cities and towns that do not meet the standard are open to lawsuits from developers whose zoning applications for high-density housing that include below-market-rate units are rejected.

According to a state Department of Economic and Community Development survey released in April, 11.45 percent, or 3,864 of Norwalk's 33,753 housing units, qualified as affordable last year -- down from 11.77 percent, or 3,972 units, in 2004.

Light believes the city will remain above 10 percent for the near future, although others are skeptical.

The Norwalk Redevelopment Agency has said the state count is artificially high because it relies on housing data from the 2000 census and the city could find itself at or below 10 percent in 2010 when the numbers are updated.

Assistant Redevelopment Director Jack Burritt said agency staff recently completed double-checking the state numbers and believes it over-counted by 329 units, decreasing the percentage of affordable housing to 10.47 percent.

"They had some double counting and projects that hadn't been developed," he said.

Copyright © 2006, Southern Connecticut Newspapers, Inc.

_________________________________________________________________________________

October 7, 2006

 

Advocate

Parties meet to discuss fate of historic building

By John Nickerson
Staff Writer

NORWALK -- Negotiations yesterday between the owner of the Norwalk Inn and Conference Center and preservationists did not yield any results, but the two sides said they were encouraged by the dialogue.

The preservationists are trying to save a historic home threatened by the hotel's planned expansion.

"I don't want to say we have more hope that we can save the building, but we have a better opportunity to do that now that we are talking," Mayor Richard Moccia said after attending a noon meeting with hotel owner Chris Handrinos and Norwalk Preservation Trust President Tod Bryant.

The participants have agreed to meet in the future but have not set a date, Moccia said.

Two weeks ago, Handrinos applied for a demolition permit for the historic Grumman-St. John house at 93 East Ave. to make way for a 43-room expansion.

The trust invoked the city's 90-day demolition delay ordinance, that can hold up tear downs of structures more than 50 years old for three months.

Bryant said the white mansard-roofed building should be preserved because the core of the structure dates back to 1741.

If Bryant's claim is correct, that part of the building would date to before the Battle of Norwalk, making it one of a handful of structures that remain after the British burned the city in 1779.

Bryant said yesterday's meeting at City Hall, which included city attorney Robert Maslan, Planning Director Michael Greene and his assistant Michael Wrinn, was positive and everyone agreed to explore ideas to save the building.

He declined, however, to get into specifics.

"It's too soon to get into any kind of detail," Bryant said. "I think it was a productive meeting. It was good that everyone was in the same room and talking, which hasn't happened in five years."

Last week, after it was announced that the building made the 2006 Connecticut Trust for Historic Preservation's Most Important Threatened Historic Places list, Handrinos reiterated his offer from five years ago that he would save the home if he could put a third story on his hotel.

The building zones in which the hotel is situated, however, would not allow a third story without zoning regulation changes or a variance.

Greene also declined to share the details of yesterday's talks.

"There were a couple ideas that we talked about, and there are issues that were discussed that need to be looked at by the parties involved," Greene said. "I'm always hopeful when people are talking."

A message left for Handrinos at the Norwalk Inn was not immediately returned.

Copyright © 2006, Southern Connecticut Newspapers, Inc.

_________________________________________________________________________________

September 27, 2006

 

Hour

Commission declines vote on Fitch site condo plan after residents protest

By ROBERT KOCH

Hour Staff Writer

NORWALK — Olmstead Place residents told the city's Conservation Commission Tuesday night that their flooding woes will increase if a proposed 29-unit condominium development is built on the site of the former Fitch School on Strawberry Hill Avenue in East Norwalk.

Assurances from the developer's attorney and engineers that the housing development would reduce storm-water runoff and improve the site didn't seem to alleviate their fears. Those fears stem from a slope leading downward from the site into a pond, which sometimes floods onto their properties.

"We have a problem now. It's going to be worse," said Demetrius Arnone, who lives at 39 Olmstead Place. "I really wish you would consider turning this proposal down, because we're going to get inundated with more (water). Every time the sky opens, I have to keep my fingers crossed."

Arnone and his wife, JoAnne, were among nearly two-dozen residents to sound off Tuesday night against DT Development Co. LLC's application to raze the former school and two adjacent houses at 61 and 63 Strawberry Hill Ave. and build 29 condominiums. After the public hearing and discussion, conservation commissioners postponed action on the application.

"We all just agreed we weren't ready to vote on it," said Commissioner Marny Smith afterward. "We all felt that considering the opposition, we had to look more carefully at the drainage report. We were all quite surprised about the degree of opposition. None of us were prepared for that kind of opposition."

"We'll probably make a decision at our next meeting on the 10th of October," Smith added.

The slope, located on city-owned land immediately behind the former school, mandates Conservation Commission review of the application. DT Development also needs the city's Zoning Commission to lift the cap on planned residential developments to permit 29 new units.

On Tuesday night, Norwalk attorney David F. Waters and three consultants representing DT Development pitched the storm-water drainage plan to distrustful residents. The plan includes additional landscaping, erosion controls on the slope, and underground detention tanks designed to catch the first inch of rainfall and slowly release it into the soil.

"A good percentage of the water is going into those (tanks). You get a lot gentler flow," said landscape architect Don Strait of Norwalk-based Grumman Engineering LLC. "It infiltrates down into the soil. That's what prevents that spike of water coming through."

Many residents shook their heads in disbelief.

Among those speaking against the condominium development was Diane Cece, who has frequently asked the city to help eliminate flooding on her property at 37 Olmstead Place.

"Because we know that even in a moderate rainstorm, the pond has overflowed into several of our back yards, and in serious rainfalls can and has caused substantial damage, we oppose any development that calls for additional runoff to the pond, or any areas southwest of the (former) school," Cece said.

Commissioner Matthew A. Caputo asked residents how long they have experienced flooding on their properties, then pressed the developers' representatives for numbers.

"What kind of calculations do we have for maybe different (rainfall) events?" Caputo asked. "If you're contending you're decreasing (runoff), show us the numbers — it's a 5-percent reduction, it's a 10-percent reduction?"

Strait said the condominium development would reduce the amount of impervious surface — paved areas, rooftops, etc. — from 80,588 square feet to 53,732 square feet. The drainage system would reduce runoff from a 25-year storm from 43,800 cubic feet to 36,900 cubic feet of water, he added.

Said Waters: "The wetlands and pond that already exist will not be impacted in a negative manner."

East Norwalk Councilman Kevin M. Poruban, speaking to The Hour last week, pointed to water channels cut into the slope. Poruban said he hadn't seen DT Development's plan, but added that he also has concerns.

"Whatever they do, they cannot add to the problem we have here," Poruban said.

_________________________________________________________________________________

September 21, 2006

 

Hour

90-day demolition delay requested for 93 East Ave.

By ROBERT KOCH

Hour Staff Writer

NORWALK — The president of the Norwalk Preservation Trust on Wednesday asked the city to impose its 90-day demolition delay ordinance to save a house at 93 East Ave.

The house stands in the way of the Norwalk Inn & Conference Center's long-planned expansion.

"Both the Norwalk Inn and your office are in possession of a letter from the Connecticut Historical Commission. ... Please stop the demolition permit process pursuant to this letter," wrote Preservation Trust President Tod Bryant, in the first of two e-mails to Norwalk Chief Building Official William Ireland. "Please invoke the 90-day delay of demolition on 93 East Ave."
 

In response, Ireland wrote that the city's Building and Code Enforcement Department has not yet received an intent-to-demolish application. Ireland continued that he is aware of the letter from the state commission.

Byrant e-mailed Ireland Tuesday after reading a legal notice announcing the intent-to-demolish application, and again Wednesday after seeing a sign announcing the application posted outside the house. The Preservation Trust maintains that the house at 93 East Ave. is historic and should be preserved.

"The whole idea of a demolition delay is to get the parties to try to negotiate a way to save the building," Bryant told The Hour.

The Norwalk Inn, located at 99 East Ave., plans to demolish the house to accommodate a 40-room expansion. The project has been tied up in court for several years, after neighboring property owner Dr. Rishon H. Stember in 2001 and 2002 appealed decisions by the city's Zoning Board of Appeals and Zoning Commission allowing the expansion to proceed.

The inn and Stember earlier this year reached a settlement that would shift the proposed new inn wing and common driveway away from Stember's business at 91 East Ave., but still raze the house at 93 East Ave. Stamford Superior Court has yet to review the settlement.

Norwalk Inn co-owner Chris Handrinos said he was not surprised to learn of the demolition delay request.

"The preservationists are trying every means, whether proper or improper, to delay," Handrinos said. "That is costing us a lot of money. We'll offer (the house) to them, not only to take it, but to pay some of the expenses to move it."

Handrinos said the inn pulled intent-to-demolish paperwork from the city and plans to return it by Friday. He described the demolition as separate from the court issues regarding the expansion.

"We intend to demolish the house, no matter what. It's not connected with the court case. The court issue is about a change in zoning. It has nothing to do with (93 East Ave.)," Handrinos said. "All the court issues have to do with is planning and zoning."

Bryant, in his e-mail to Ireland Tuesday, wrote that a letter from the Connecticut Historical Commission — now the state Commission on Culture and Tourism — dated Jan. 11, 2002, remains binding.

According to Bryant, the letter states in part that "the office of the Attorney General requests that you provide the commission with written assurance that you will not 1) file an application for a demolition permit or 2) undertake any physically-destructive activities to the subject property prior to appearing at a future public meeting to discuss your proposed project."

Bryant said Susan Chandler of the History Division of the Connecticut Commission on Culture and Tourism has assured him that the letter remains in effect "since the Norwalk Inn has never appeared before the commission."

Chandler could not be reached for comment Wednesday afternoon.

_________________________________________________________________________________

August 5, 2006

 

Advocate

http://www.norwalkadvocate.com/news/local/scn-sa-nor.pepperidge5aug05,0,7109246.story?coll=nor-news-local-headlines

Pact may clear way for condos

By John Nickerson
Staff Writer

August 5, 2006

NORWALK -- A tentative settlement has been reached that could allow a 235-unit luxury condominium development to proceed on the old Pepperidge Farm bakery site on Westport Avenue.

Attorney David Waters, who represents developer FF Realty LLC, said an "agreement in principle" has been reached between the Texas-based developer and two homeowner associations who filed appeals against the city's Conservation and Zoning commissions.

The panels approved the project in June and July 2005.

The project planned for the 15-acre site at 595 Westport Ave. has been in limbo for a little more than a year since the appeals were filed in state Superior Court in Stamford by the neighboring Birchwood Townhouses Condominium Association and Terra Nova Homeowners Association.

Waters said a compromise plan may come before the two panels in the next month.

"There are some changes being made to the plan that will require further review by the Conservation and Zoning commissions," he said last week.

Budd Schwartz, treasurer of the 66-unit Birchwood Townhouses Condominium Association and a plaintiff in the appeals, said he thinks the settlement is a step in the right direction.

He said FF Realty has brought in a new architect to redesign the development, putting what was planned to be an underground 500-car garage above ground.

Schwartz said the homeowner associations were against the underground garage because it would require excavation blasting and long lines of dump trucks coming in and out of the site to remove the debris.

Schwartz said plans now call for the construction inside the Pepperidge Farm site to be pulled further back from Hills Lane, the site of the Birchwood and Terra Nova developments.

Some of the units will have to be reduced in size to make the plan work, he said.

"It appears we are going in the right direction and I'm hopeful that we can resolve it soon," Schwartz said. "They ended up with a much better design than what they had before."

The appeal seeking to overturn the Conservation Commission's decision said that evidence was ignored indicating the development would create stormwater runoff problems and threaten wetlands.

The appeal against the Zoning Commission decision argued that evidence, which pointed to the project's noncompliance with zoning regulations regarding building height and setbacks, also was ignored.

The suit also said that the project would hurt property values.

Waters and Fairfield attorney John Fallon, who is representing Birchwood and Terra Nova, declined to comment on what the new plans would look like.

"I will not have any comment with regard to any aspect of that case. The cases are pending before the Superior Court and I will have no comment with regards to any settlement discussions that are ongoing," Fallon said in a phone message. Calls seeking further comment were not returned.

Waters said he expected that the two commissions would look favorably at the new plan.

Planning and Zoning Director Michael Greene declined to comment on the plans, saying he had not seen the new plans.

When proposed last year, project plans called for the construction of three residential buildings, totaling 450,000 square feet, in nearly the same place the shuttered bakery now stands.

The buildings, each four stories, would surround an 11,000-square-foot clubhouse with a pool. The proposal also included a 33,000-square-foot expansion of Pepperidge Farm's existing 78,000-square-foot corporate offices next door.

Copyright © 2006, Southern Connecticut Newspapers, Inc.

_________________________________________________________________________________

July, 2006

Connecticut

Whitman, Glendening Speak Out on Government's Role in Growth Patterns

Quite sure that much of Connecticut's ''misplaced development is aided and abetted, and even subsidized, by state policies and practices,'' as it was in their own states when they took office in 1994 and 1995, former New Jersey Republican Governor and 2001-03 EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman and former two-term Maryland Democratic Governor, now Smart Growth Leadership Institute President Parris N. Glendening point out in a Hartford Courant commentary that growth pattern changes ''cannot be accomplished in any lasting way unless the state government plays a major part'' and that ''it certainly helps if the governor makes it a personal priority.''

Maryland, they write, was ''funding infrastructure and school construction in areas where neither the locality nor the state had planned for development'' until lawmakers passed the 1997 Smart Growth Act, under which the state ''began to remove subsidies for sprawl and instead steer funds toward communities that had planned to absorb growth in a smaller, better-planned footprint.''

New Jersey was losing open space while cities struggled to revitalize until voters approved the 1998 bond issue which will raise more than $1 billion to preserve 1 million acres by 2010 and the state ''took steps to make it easier to redevelop in existing areas, reclaim industrial brownfields and adopt older buildings for re-use.''

Not always easy, the moves gained strong bipartisan support when the public understood their benefits such as ''holding down property tax bills, creating alternatives to traffic congestion, creating healthy communities, and expanding recreational and other opportunities,'' the two former governors and National Smart Growth Council co-chairmen write, stressing the need for three elements to ensure reform continuity ''beyond the current governor.''

There must be ''a statewide smart planning and investment framework'' codified in law; a nongovernmental advocacy organization -- like 1,000 Friends of Connecticut or Maryland or New Jersey or any other state -- must keep watch, to prevent erosion of commitment to smart growth; and governments and nonprofit groups must ''invest in an ongoing public discussion of the issues,'' they write, crediting The Courant for ''making a tremendous start'' in that area.

Specifically, they continue, the state leadership should focus on four goals. It should ensure that planning happens and incorporates ''meaningful'' public input, and that there is a state agency responsible for planning and a cabinet post ''for coordinating state agencies overseeing transportation, environment, housing'' and related sectors; connect transportation and land use, because ''(i)f you build communities so every activity requires a long car trip, no amount of pavement will cure congestion;'' work with employers and businesses on economic development, because they ''want to know that workers can find housing and transportation close to jobs;'' and make sure ''tax policies are working for, and not against, community and state goals,'' with too heavy dependence on property taxes often forcing localities to take ''a development-at-any-cost-attitude,'' and compete for commercial projects or zone only for the most expensive housing.

''Based on what we've seen, Connecticut has the elements necessary to become a national model for innovations in guiding growth for betterment of the state's people,'' the two former governors conclude. ''All that is needed is public, private and community leadership to put it in motion.'' -- Courant  7/9/2006

Click here to view the source article.
Click here to view the source publication.

_________________________________________________________________________________

July 6, 2006

 

Hour

New state law adds surcharge to moving violation tickets

By JILL BODACH

Hour Staff Writer

NORWALK — Motorists caught by police violating the rules of the road will now have to pay an additional $10 surcharge for their wrongdoing.

A new Connecticut law, which goes into effect this month, will add the surcharge to every ticket issued for speeding, failure to yield, making an illegal turn and numerous other violations.

Currently, the money earned off speeders is given to the state but the new surcharge was added so that the municipalities who fund the work of the patrol officers can receive the funds. The accumulated funds will be forwarded to the municipalities four times a year.
 

Police Chief Harry Rilling said that the new law will probably yield approximately $50,000 to $55,000 per year for the city. This money will be put into the city's general fund and likely be used to hire officers for selective motor vehicle enforcement.

"Motor vehicle enforcement is very labor intensive because it generally involves assigning an officer or two to a particular area to spend a significant amount of time watching for violations," Rilling said. "These officers are typically pulled off other duties to do this."

Speeding and other motor vehicle violations are serious issues in Norwalk, Rilling said.

"I'm appalled at how many times I see people blatantly go through red lights two to three seconds after the light has turned red as if they never had any intention of stopping at all," Rilling said. "People are not as focused on their driving as they used to be and there are motor vehicle violations occurring all over the place."

For the past four years Senator Bob Duff, D-25, has pushed for the approval of this legislation. Now that it has passed, he is hopeful that Norwalk's roads will become safer for motorists and pedestrians.

"I supported this from the beginning because speeding is one of the biggest complaints I hear about from residents of Norwalk and it's really a quality of life issue, but with our limited resources we can't afford to just have police officers sit and wait for speeders," Duff said.

The money paid to police officers who man speed traps is primarily from the overtime budget of the department. Some of it comes from grant money from the state awarded to departments for use in selective motor vehicle enforcement of any kind.

Those against the law think that the added incentive of monetary compensation for issuing tickets might lead to a surge in tickets being given to the public.

Duff said no.

"I think the surcharge is fair and not so outrageous that it is going to become a revenue stream for the city, but it will provide money for the city to pay officers to increase their presence on streets where speeding and other violations are common," Duff said.

Rilling said that regardless of the financial returns to the city officers will not issue violations unless they are warranted.

"There might be more tickets as result of this but not because they are doing it for the incentive, but because there is more money available to hire these patrols," Rilling said.

Rilling said that the law is fair because it is punishing those who violate the law, not the law abiding taxpayer.

"I don't think it's unreasonable for the person responsible for the violation to pay for the efforts of enforcement of these violations," Rilling said.

Money aside, the main issue is safety and Duff said he hopes that the availability of additional officers will increase safety.

"I just think that this will help the quality of life in Norwalk and make our local roads safer," Duff said.

_________________________________________________________________________________

July 6, 2006

 

Hour

P&E site sold for $16M

By ROBERT KOCH

Hour Staff Writer

NORWALK — The former Perkin-Elmer Corp. property at 761 Main Ave. has been sold for $16 million, according to the Town Clerk's office.

Perkin-spinoff Applera Corp., located at 307 Merritt 7, sold the property to i.park Norwalk LLC, c/o National Resources, 485 W. Putnam Ave., Greenwich, for $16,027,200, according to paperwork filed with the clerk's office.

The Tax Assessor's office has the property valued at $15.7 million on the city's 2005 Grand List of taxable property.

Officials at National Resources could not be reached Wednesday afternoon to comment on their plans for the property.

An image posted on the company's Web site, however, shows a mixed-use development with a four-story apartment building, two three-story condominium buildings, a health club with a 50-meter indoor pool, and other space at the address, which straddles the Norwalk-Wilton border.

According to i.park, the property lies in a "prime location" off the Route 7-Interstate 95 Connector and a quarter mile from the Merritt Parkway, and has good connections to the Norwalk Wheels Bus Services and Metro-North Railroad.

The development would follow i.park's pattern of converting corporate and industrial buildings into what it describes as "intelligent" energy-efficient spaces that offer rents 25 percent below market."

Projects to date include the conversion of the Lockheed Martin property in Lake Success, N.Y., into a business campus office. In Yonkers, i.park Hudson has resulted in 750,000 square feet of office and flex space along the Hudson River.

The Norwalk property was once headquarters to the Perkin-Elmer Corp., which manufactured optical equipment for, among other things, the Hubble Space Telescope. The company was one of Norwalk's largest employers.

The Norwalk portion of the property spans 18 acres and includes a two-story steel-frame brick industrial building that was constructed in 1950. The property is listed as in fair condition, according to the Assessor's office.

The city will receive $80,136 from sale of the property through the real-estate conveyance tax; the state will get $160,272, said Town Clerk Andrew S. Garfunkel.

On the Web:

http://www.ipark2000.com/norwalk.html

_________________________________________________________________________________

June 30, 2006

 

Hour

'Quality of life' more than trite description for us

"Quality of life" has become the buzzword phrase of the year, and it's tossed around by politicians and bureaucrats at all levels of government. Its frequency of use may make it seem trite, but there is something to be said for it — or at least for making it a fact of life.

Mayor Richard A. Moccia has called for a focus on such issues, and it's hard to fault the approach. Much of the quality of life depends on the enforcement of existing building codes, zoning regulations and even motor vehicle laws.

When you start talking about what an individual does — or doesn't do — with his or her property, there's always a danger of infringing on those rights.

We agree that there should be enforcement of the laws as it pertains to illegal apartments, parking of vehicles on sidewalks and even on front lawns. Whether it can be extended to such items as an overgrown lawn is something else again.

Neighborhood associations have taken the leadership in making residents aware of the problems in their area, and how to best work to remedy them.


How far a municipality can go in pressing property owners to clean up their act is a question for the lawyers. We hope we're not at the stage of the "lawn police" yet.

We have urged stricter zoning regulations as one way of controlling development. Whether the city can develop a "blight ordinance" remains to be seen. Blight, like beauty, too often is in the eye of the beholder.

Along those same lines of quality of life, we are happy to see the return of "slow down days" in Norwalk.

This means Norwalk police will be stepping up enforcement of the speed limits, among other motor vehicle laws.

They also hope to crack down on noise violations, particularly annoying in the summertime. Whether it's motorcyclists or hot-rodders or just plain old jalopies with blown mufflers, they are all a nuisance.

Now that school's out, there needs to be special attention to speeding. With youngsters out riding bikes and the like, drivers need to be alert.

Nothing will make an impression on a motorist like a hefty speeding ticket.

While the police are at it, we hope they enforce other motor vehicle laws, such as wearing seat belts, use of proper child safety seats, observance of the "no right turn on red' signs, and the requirement that all vehicles displays both front and rear license plates.

Now that's a full plate for "slow down" days.

_________________________________________________________________________________

June 30, 2006

 

Hour

Spinnaker appeals Norden Place rejection

By ROBERT KOCH

Hour Staff Writer

NORWALK — Developer Spinnaker Cos. has appealed the Zoning Commission's rejection of its plan for multifamily housing on the Norden site, adding to litigation against the city over the development.

"The defendant Zoning Commission denied the application (to allow multifamily housing) despite the fact that the city of Norwalk Planning Commission unanimously approved the amendment," reads a portion of the appeal prepared by attorney Elizabeth A. Suchy of the Norwalk law firm Tierney Zullo Flaherty & Murphy PC. The commission "denied the application ... despite the undisputed and uncontroverted testimony and evidence presented to it that industrial and manufacturing uses and tenants are no longer locating to Fairfield County or Connecticut."

Today was the last day for Norden Place LLC — a Spinnaker spin-off — to appeal the Zoning Commission decision made June 7. In May, Norden Place appealed the Conservation Commission's denial of its application.


"Obviously (Norden Place) feels there are grounds for appeal and the court will make a decision," said Zoning Commission Vice Chairman Robert Keyes, who voted against the zoning change.

Zoning commissioners rejected the zoning change on a 3-3 vote. A majority vote was needed for approval.

The Norden Place application, as acted on by the Zoning Commission, called for 328 apartments and condominiums to be built between NordenPark and the Westport border. The 38-acre parcel is now zoned for restricted industrial use. The Zoning Commission rejected Norden Place's request to modify zoning regulations to allow multifamily housing as an additional use.

The 10-page appeal, filed with the Town Clerk's office Thursday and headed to state Superior Court in Stamford, challenges the commission's rejection of the zoning change request, as well as denial of the site plan. After rejecting the zoning change, the commission had by default rejected the site plan, as multifamily housing would not be permitted on what remained industrial-zoned land.

According to the appeal, the commission rejected the zoning change despite evidence of a need for affordable housing. The appeal further alleges that some commission members "conducted ex-parte discussions with outside agencies and experts after the public hearing on the applications had been closed."

Robert F. Maslan Jr., assistant corporation counsel for the city, received the new appeal Thursday and said he would need time to review it before responding to specific allegations. Speaking generally, Maslan Jr. said applicants usually do not prevail when appealing a zoning commission's rejection of a zoning change.

"The Zoning Commission acts in a legislative capacity and has broad discretion to grant or deny such applications. A court is typically not going to reverse a decision by a zoning commission on an application to change, because the court would substituting its own discretion for the discretion of the commission," Maslan Jr. said. With "a site plan (the question is) does it comply? Then you have a set of regulations. Some are discretionary."

At several points, the appeal refers to expanding the city's housing stock.

"The defendant Zoning Commission's findings were contract to multifamily endorsed by the city of Norwalk ad-hoc Industrial Land Task Force's recommendations," reads the appeal.

Spinnaker Cos. agreed to boost the percentage of affordably priced units from 10 percent to 15 percent, after the city's Industrial Zones Committee endorsed allowing multifamily housing on the Norden site provided that 15-percent of the resulting units be priced affordably.

Ten percent of units would target individuals or families earning up to 80 percent of the state median income; 5 percent would be available to those earning up to 60 percent of the state median income. The state median income now stands at about $81,000.

While proponents have pushed the affordable housing aspect of the project, East Norwalk residents and others maintain the development, if approved, would add to traffic along Strawberry Hill Avenue and strain schools, emergency services and other infrastructure. The proposed development drew largely negative reactions during an informational presentation at the East Norwalk Library on Jan. 31.

In the Zoning Commission action June 7, commission Chairwoman Dorothy Mobilia, Robert Hard and Karen Spencer backed the zoning change. Keyes, Andrea Light and Patrick Shields voted no.

Mobilia said the change would place "on the books, a 15-percent guarantee for work-force housing" — a priority for the commission — while Shields said Norden Place could "come back with a better proposal." Light said the Conservation Commission has "a lot of issues with the site plan."

According to the Conservation Commission, Norden Place provided no information to show that detention basins would treat run-off during storms exceeding one inch of rain.

In addition to the Zoning Commission approvals, Norden Place needs a wetlands permit from the Conservation Commission to proceed with the development.

_________________________________________________________________________________

June 30, 2006

 

Advocate

Zoning panel moves could dim affordable housing outlook

By Brian Lockhart
Staff Writer

June 30, 2006

NORWALK -- Efforts to craft an affordable housing policy may have been dealt a blow this week by some Common Council Democrats -- the same party that for years has campaigned for cheaper housing.

The council Tuesday replaced a pair of Democratic zoning commissioners, who were vocal affordable housing advocates, with a more conservative Republican and an unaffiliated voter with unknown views on the subject.

One of the replaced commissioners, Chairwoman Dorothy Mobilia, ran a subcommittee of zoning and planning commissioners who are drafting "inclusionary zoning" policies that would require developers to build affordable units. She had hoped to be reappointed and to finalize the regulations for presentation to the full Zoning Commission this fall.

The Zoning Commission would then hold public hearings before deciding to implement anything.

But according to an informal poll yesterday of the two new and five sitting zoning commissioners, inclusionary zoning regulations will have a harder time gaining votes.

Mobilia's departure and that of Democrat David Watts, who did not seek another term, leaves two commissioners who support inclusionary zoning -- vice chairman Robert Keyes and Corrine Weston, both Democrats.

Independent voter Andrea Light said she "is not supportive of mandatory affordable (housing)" and Republican commissioners Patrick Shields and Jackie Lightfield said they are unsure.

"I'm in favor of a diverse mixture of housing in Norwalk, but not sure how we get there," Shields said.

Mobilia's replacement, Larry Bentley, has been involved with the Mutual Housing Association of Southwestern Connecticut, a nonprofit agency that helps people purchase homes, but did not want to discuss his views on affordable housing regulations.

"I haven't even had my first meeting yet," Bentley said.

Watts' replacement, James White, who had previously served on the Zoning Commission under former Republican Mayor Frank Esposito, said he "sees the need" for affordable housing but does not believe it is something "that can be totally legislated."

Both men were nominated by Republican Mayor Richard Moccia, who does not support inclusionary zoning because he thinks it will deter developers from building in the city.

"It's a substantial setback," said Councilman Matthew Miklave, a Democrat who did not want to replace Mobilia.

Lightfield, who serves on Mobilia's affordable housing subcommittee, said she is uncertain what the chairwoman's departure means for that group.

The next meeting is scheduled July 13.

"It was definitely moseying along with Dorothy's efforts," Lightfield said. "Without someone to champion something, things get sidetracked."

Councilman Carvin Hilliard, one of several Democrats who joined the council's Republican minority in replacing Mobilia, said he was not convinced she had done enough since joining the Zoning Commission in 2003.

"If we thought Dorothy Mobilia was legitimately in favor of affordable housing, it wouldn't have been a second thought," said Hilliard, who supports inclusionary zoning. "I go by performance."

Council President Michael Coffey, also a Democrat, agreed, saying he had been unaware of Mobilia's subcommittee and has never seen any proposed inclusionary zoning legislation.

"As we sit here today, there is no affordable (housing) plan in place," Coffey said. Coffey was one of five Democrats on the Common Council who voted to oust Mobilia on Tuesday He said he disagreed with her vote to allow a zone change to allow housing to be built on the industrially zoned Norden Park site in East Norwalk. Mobilia had negotiated with the developers of that project to price 15 percent of the proposed 278 condominiums below market rates. Democrats have been touting the need for affordable housing policies since 2002, soon after former Mayor Alex Knopp's initial victory over seven-term Republican Esposito.

Knopp initially supported inclusionary zoning, at one point circulating drafts of legislation through City Hall. But Knopp lost his enthusiasm for the effort. Although Democrats controlled the council and land-use boards, no one else took a leadership position on passing an inclusionary zoning regulation.

The debate was revived last year when the Norwalk Redevelopment Agency, concerned about the future of affordable housing, hired consultant Alan Mallach to recommend some policies for the land-use boards and Common Council to consider. Topping Mallach's list, released late last summer, was inclusionary zoning.

Mobilia and Planning Commission Chairman Walter Briggs formed the subcommittee in response to the report with the aim of implementing measures to increase the city's affordable housing stock.

The subcommittee began meeting in December and has since held a handful of gatherings discussing affordable housing policies and gathering input from the Greater Norwalk Chamber of Commerce and some developers.

Though Moccia opposes inclusionary zoning, he so far has not had enough appointments on the land-use boards to quash any efforts to pass it.

Miklave said that is why he voted against replacing Mobilia and abstained from backing White.

"Simply losing the knowledge base and the time Dorothy spent studying this issue is a setback," Miklave said. "And replacing folks who support (affordable housing) with those who don't is another setback."

Hilliard said he has served with Bentley on other city boards and is "very comfortable" with him.

Though council Democrats have scrutinized some of Moccia's suggested appointments to other commissions, Coffey said it was not warranted in White's case because he was once zoning commissioner.

"In critical policy appointments to boards, a mayor should be allowed to select some of the people he wishes to serve," Coffey said. "We're not always selecting people because of party affiliation."

Mobilia said her subcommittee should conclude its work, whether or not the Zoning Commission and its new members pass an inclusionary zoning regulation.

"Have the public hearings," Mobilia said. "Norwalk's getting more expensive. . . . Present this information to the public and get their reaction."

Copyright © 2006, Southern Connecticut Newspapers, Inc.

_________________________________________________________________________________

June 30, 2006

 

Advocate

NordenPark developer appeals condo rejection

By John Nickerson
Staff Writer

June 30, 2006

NORWALK -- NordenPlace LLC filed a lawsuit yesterday against the city and Zoning Commission for its decision two weeks ago that scuttled a proposed 278-unit condominium complex at NordenPark.

Attorney Elizabeth Suchy filed the seven-page appeal in state Superior Court in Stamford, charging that NordenPlace was denied due process and its property has been devalued.

NordenPlace is affiliated with the Spinnaker Cos., primary developer of Reed-Putnam, the city's largest urban renewal project.

The denial of the proposal to allow residential use of the industrially zoned property was made "despite the undisputed and uncontroverted testimony and evidence presented to it that the proposed multifamily use with mandatory 15 percent affordable housing would provide viable and needed affordable housing," the suit states.

The property is south of Interstate 95 near the Westport border.

Suchy declined to comment on the appeal, saying that the court papers spoke for themselves.

City staff attorney Robert Maslan said he was confident that the court would uphold the commission's decision.

"The hearings were held in accordance with the applicable statutes and regulations," Maslan said.

On June 8, the Zoning Commission cast a 3-3 vote on a proposed amendment to zoning regulations that would have allowed the multifamily development on the 38-acre parcel. As part of the proposal, 50 of the residential units would be priced below market rate.

But four votes are necessary for a zone change, and the application was denied.

As a result of the denial, zoning commissioners that night also rejected a special permit for the project's site plan, identifying where the buildings would be placed.

Yesterday's filing was the first move NordenPlace has made on the project since the denial.

The residential plan for the tree- and meadow-lined parcel also was denied by the Conservation Commission in May over concerns that a storm water drainage plan for the development could harm wetlands.

That decision was also appealed by NordenPlace in a separate lawsuit filed in May.

The suit filed yesterday charges the Zoning Commission did not properly consider its own criteria and state statutes for making zone changes, and that its decision was not supported by the evidence and testimony presented.

It also says the panel disregarded evidence that the proposal would have provided needed affordable housing, promoting housing choice and economic diversity.

The suit noted that the panel denied the application despite the unanimous approval it received from the Planning Commission.

The suit also says that NordenPlace was treated unfairly because some of the commission members conducted discussions with "outside agencies and experts" after the public hearing on the application was closed.

The suit states that the information gained from those meetings was shared with other commission members.

To that charge, Maslan said: "The applicants right to fundamental fairness in the consideration and decision of these two applications was not violated."

Copyright © 2006, Southern Connecticut Newspapers, Inc.

_________________________________________________________________________________

June 27, 2006

 

Hour

Silvermine history gets $7K boost from trust

By ROBERT KOCH

Hour Staff Writer

NORWALK — The Norwalk Association of Silvermine Homeowners got a $7,000 boost Monday toward creating a historic district and placing nearly 90 historic structures on the National Register of Historic Places.

On Monday, Helen Higgins, executive director of the Connecticut Trust for Historic Preservation, came to Silvermine Tavern on Perry Avenue and presented the neighborhood association a state grant toward the effort.

"We had a field staff work with the Norwalk Association of Silvermine Homeowners and (we) recognized the importance and unusualness of having a three-town historic district," Higgins said. "This is a highly significant historic area. This is a far-reaching project."


For several years, the association, its consultant and others have worked to create the historic district and have 88 selected properties — including Silvermine Tavern — placed on the national register. The bulk of the properties lie in Norwalk or New Canaan; several are in Wilton.

"It's an early settlement and it's been a cohesive community for two centuries," said Higgins, referring to Silvermine's history as an arts colony and milling area.

The Connecticut Trust grant will pay for Associated Cultural Resource Consultants, the firm engaged by the neighborhood association, to survey the properties to be included in the historic district.

"We will be doing a brief description of each property and we'll make our argument which makes the case for historic significance," said Phillip Esser, historic preservation consultant with Associated Cultural Resources.

Leigh Grant, president of the Silvermine Homeowners association, credited all of the nearly two-dozen people at the check presentation Monday with helping land the grant. She thanked, among others, Norwalk Mayor Richard A. Moccia and state Sen. Bob Duff, D-25, for writing letters supporting the project.

As a lawmaker, Duff worked to boost state funding for historic preservation efforts and recommended the Silvermine project for the $7,000 grant.

"Historic Preservation is important to me and very important to all the people in this room. We don't do nearly enough to preserve our history," Duff said. "The money ... coming into Silvermine will be well worth it."

Moccia said that while residents may disagree on which buildings are historically valuable in Norwalk — as evidenced by recent redevelopment battles — "it's important that all the neighborhoods work together."

"The main point is we're looking at (the issue)," Moccia said. "This is a great step for the Norwalk Association of Silvermine Homeowners."

Also present were Norwalk Preservation Trust President Tod Bryant, and Cindy Clair, executive director of the Silvermine Guild Arts Center.

Other properties in the proposed historic district: The Jacob St. John House (circa 1727) and most other houses along Silvermine Avenue, houses along the Silvermine River on Perry Avenue, and the Perry Avenue Bridge.

Grant said the history division of the Connecticut Commission on Culture and Tourism will decide whether to approve the historic district. So far, the proposed district has passed the eligibility study.

Grant, speaking to The Hour last week, said owners of the properties will benefit if the historic district is approved and their homes land on the national register.

"Number one, it actually enhances your property value. It does make you eligible for certain tax credits. It give you pride in place," Grant said. "But it does not affect your property rights."

_________________________________________________________________________________

June 26, 2006

 

Advocate

Flowers gone wild: After planting is done, a meadow blossoms along I-95 exit ramp in Norwalk

 

A wildflower meadow grows on a small patch of land just before the first stop sign on Exit 14 . . .

A wildflower meadow grows on a small patch of land just before the first stop sign on Exit 14 of Interstate 95 north in Norwalk. Norwalk Clean and Green has posted a sign asking the state not to mow the area.
(Dru Nadler/Staff photo)

By Lisa Chamoff
Staff Writer

June 26, 2006

NORWALK -- A few weeks ago, a former dumping ground and unofficial truck parking area began to blossom.

The small patch of land, just before the first stop sign on Exit 14 of Interstate 95 north, was once filled with big piles of trash. It is now an array of blues and snowy whites in a wildflower meadow, thanks to the work of a resident of the nearby Golden Hill neighborhood.

Norwalk Clean and Green, which organizes nearly 40 adopt-a-spots around the city, sponsored by local groups and businesses, decided it was time to transform the small area.

In April, landscape architect Michael Mushak, who owns an antique home in Golden Hill, seeded the ground with a northeast wildflower mix of bright blue chicory and white yarrow, along with black-eyed Susans and goldenrod that are expected to bloom in a few weeks.

Mushak had designed a more manicured Golden Hill adopt-a-spot on the opposite side of the road, but believed the area to the north would be better as a big open, grassy area. By using wildflowers, it negated the need for mowing -- Clean and Green placed a sign asking the state Department of Transportation, which owns the property, not to mow it.

The flowers thrive under poor soil conditions, and the soil at the spot was very compacted, Mushak said. The flowers require no maintenance, aside from Mushak's plans to reseed the spot in September.

The concept is unusual for the area around I-95. Though the DOT doesn't plant wildflowers, the agency does take special precautions not to mow areas with wildflowers and certain other vegetation, such as cattails, a wetland plant, as long as motorists can get off the highway safely, a DOT spokesman said.

"If you've got a section on the side of the highway with wildflowers and (they) are in bloom in the spring . . . we might not mow them," DOT spokesman Kevin Nursick said. "If there's a sensitive area, we're obviously going to take precautions."

Mushak, who often plants wildflower meadows for clients with large lawns who may not want to mow it all, said he has visited the Ladybird Johnson Wildflower Center in Austin, Texas. He was inspired by the former first lady having persuaded the state to plant wildflowers on its highways.

The concept is rare in this area, though Mushak said he has seen wildflowers along roads in upstate New York.

Wildflower meadows often contribute to the surrounding environment, Mushak said.

"There's also a lot of songbirds that like to utilize the meadow," he said. "They feed in there."

Copyright © 2006, Southern Connecticut Newspapers, Inc.

_________________________________________________________________________________

June 24, 2006

 

Advocate

Democrats divided over decision on zoning head

By Brian Lockhart
Staff Writer

June 24, 2006

NORWALK -- Republican Mayor Richard Moccia's decision not to reappoint Dorothy Mobilia as chairwoman of the Zoning Commission has split her fellow Democrats.

Council President Michael Coffey, a Democrat, is blocking Mobilia's reappointment because she supports turning commercial land into housing. But Mobilia's supporters say the commission would lose a strong advocate for new affordable housing policies without hers.

The Democratic Town Committee this week took the unusual step of passing a resolution asking Moccia to support Mobilia rather than appointing unaffiliated voter Larry Bentley to take her place.

"One of our core values in the party has been to get more 'work force housing' in Norwalk," Democratic Town Committee chairwoman Galen Wells said. "She's been a responsible, thoughtful commissioner."

Moccia said despite Republicans' differences with Mobilia over her support for affordable housing regulations, he would have reappointed her if not for opposition from Coffey and other members of the council's Democratic majority.

"I have to work with the council," Moccia said. "Nobody in my administration or my (party) called and said, 'We do not want Dorothy Mobilia.' That is the God's honest truth."

A former Advocate reporter, Mobilia was appointed to the Zoning Commission in 2003 by former Mayor Alex Knopp, replacing Republican Ernest DesRochers. Her term ends July 1.

Coffey said he opposes Mobilia in part because last month she supported a failed zoning change to allow residential construction at the industrial NordenPark in East Norwalk. He believes the existing industrial land should be preserved for commercial development, despite conclusions to the contrary by city planners and the Greater Norwalk Chamber of Commerce.

The zoning change would have allowed NordenPlace LLC to build 278 condominiums costing $300,000 to $500,000.

In an effort to get the change passed, the developer had agreed, after several months of negotiations with Mobilia and the Zoning Commission, to designate 15 percent of those units as affordable. They would cost $178,000 to $239,000 for families of four earning 60 percent or 80 percent of the state median income.

Coffey said he wants lower-cost housing built in the city, but sides with NordenPark neighbors who said the project was too dense and being sold "in the guise of affordable housing."

Coffey also argues the Zoning Commission under Mobilia has been too slow to craft a "cohesive" approach to building more affordable housing.

Mobilia said Coffey's criticism of her is contradictory. On the one hand, he says wants more affordable housing. On the other hand, he opposes the NordenPark project, which included affordable housing.

"This is a Democrat?" Mobilia said.

She said she has been working hard to find ways to build more affordable housing in Norwalk.

Over the past few months, Mobilia has been running a subcommittee with Planning Commission Chairman Walter Briggs to craft a citywide inclusionary zoning policy.

Inclusionary zoning, adopted a few years ago in Stamford, forces developers to include a percentage of affordably priced units in their market-rate developments or contribute money toward future projects.

Mobilia and city planners want more affordable housing to ensure the city remains above the state threshold of 10 percent affordable units, a rule set for all municipalities during the 1980s. Cities and towns that do not meet it are open to lawsuits from developers whose zoning applications for high-density housing developments that include below-market-rate units are rejected.

According to a state Department of Economic and Community Development survey released in April, 11.45 percent, or 3,864 of Norwalk's 33,753 housing units, qualified as affordable last year -- down from 11.77 percent, or 3,972 units, in 2004.

The goal was to a draft policy to the full Zoning Commission in August or September. Mobilia said she hopes that work continues if she is not reappointed.

Wells said at least five of the 10 Democrats on the council would support Mobilia. But she also faces opposition from the council's five Republicans.

"Dorothy has really been in the forefront of affordable housing regulations," Council Minority Leader Douglas Hempstead said. "Maybe that doesn't sit well with everybody."

Coffey said Bentley, Mobilia's possible replacement, is "very well-qualified" and has "bipartisan support."

A business development officer for Patriot National Bank, Bentley has been a member of the Greater Norwalk Chamber of Commerce's Small Business Council and a Norwalk police commissioner.

Asked yesterday to outline his views on affordable housing, Bentley said it would be premature.

Copyright © 2006, Southern Connecticut Newspapers, Inc.

_________________________________________________________________________________

June 18, 2006

 

Hour

Local developer completes $250,000 building renovation

By ROBERT KOCH

Hour Staff Writer

NORWALK — A uniform facade and European tones are part of the recently completed $250,000 facelift to the half-century building housing Marshalls department store on Westport Avenue.

"The building itself, the way it evolved, had (several) different types of architecture, and frankly we thought it was an eyesore," said Michael F. DiScala, president of M.F. DiScala & Co. Inc., the Norwalk developer that owns the building and spearheaded its exterior overhaul. The project "was a complete makeover. We raised and lowered the (facade) height of the building, so it would be uniform."

Gone is the disjointed look and the dull gray roof. In their place is a uniform facade, accented columns and terracotta tone. DiScala spotted the color in Italy.

"Most of the buildings around (Norwalk) use earth tones, which is nice, but we thought we'd think out of the box," DiScala said.

Built in 1957, the steel-and-brick building was once home to Grand Union Supermarket. M.F. DiScala & Co. purchased the property about 25 years ago. After Grand Union filed for bankruptcy about five years ago, M.F. DiScala began leasing it to Marshalls and 10 satellite stores, DiScala said.

For an architect, DiScala & Co. turned to Transystems Corp., an architectural and engineering firm with offices in Norwalk. The challenge to the design team was to merge disparate buildings that had evolved independent of one another.

"We did the design studies to develop the transitions of the different buildings to one another. You have basically four different buildings by different architects that needed to be transitioned," said Jim Silvester, principal vice president with Transystems. "That was the intent ... to basically get the look of a single building from four different buildings."

On the color treatment, Silvester said DiScala brought back a photographic image of a hotel in Italy. Transystems applied the color to the renovated facade. That and treatment of the columns resulted in a new yet recognizable look.

"Mike's intent was to basically bring a Mediterranean architectural flavor to that building through the color and the architectural treatment," Silvester said.

So far, at least one tenant is pleased with the building's new look.

Won Song, owner of Elegance Drycleaning, which moved into the building in 2003, wrote DiScala a letter thanking him for the renovation work.

"It is more attractive than before," Won Song told The Hour. "And they changed the sign. Before it was plastic on the awning, but this sign is illuminated and automatically turns on and off. They spent a lot of money for the tenants. I think it will bring a lot of customers."

DiScala hopes other property owners in Norwalk will take notice.

"We did it out of pride of ownership. We hope it has a ripple effect," DiScala said.

M.F. DiScala & Co., whose offices are based in the refurbished historic Trolley Barn at 10 Wall St., is the designated developer for the head-of-the-harbor portion of the city's Wall Street Redevelopment Plan.

In Middletown, M.F. DiScala and & Co. are proceeding with $6 million expansion of Millennium Business Park. The project will create a facility for International Paper and up to 850,000 square feet overall, DiScala said.  Photo of Marshalls.pdf

_________________________________________________________________________________

June 8, 2006

 

Advocate

Condo plan dead as zoning change denied

By John Nickerson
Staff Writer

NORWALK -- A proposal to build a massive housing development in an industrial park near the Westport border failed to win a necessary zoning change last night, effectively killing the NordenPark project.

The city's Zoning Commission split its vote 3-3 on an amendment to the city's zoning regulations to allow multifamily housing on industrially zoned property.

Norden Place LLC principal Clay Fowler called the commission's action a "slap in the face" and said he did not understand it. In an attempt to get the zone change, Fowler had pledged to set aside 50 of the units as affordable housing.

Fowler said the $1 million spent to develop the proposal appeared lost, and he questioned whether he would spend another $1 million to make another proposal.

The controversial plan to build 278 condominiums on 38 acres south of Interstate 95 was faltering after a May 16 denial of a wetlands permit for the project by the city's Conservation Commission.

Kim Morque, another principal in Norden Place LLC, said he was disappointed by the apparent contradiction in words and deeds over the need for affordable housing.

"We do think that actions speak louder than words," Morque said. "The message is there is a real disconnect between policy and action."

Before the vote, Zoning Commission Chairwoman Dorothy Mobilia expressed her support for the zoning change, saying that a residential use for the property would be more consistent with its surroundings than an industrial use. That view is shared by zoning commissioners in Westport, she said.

Citing the Greater Norwalk Chamber of Commerce's support for the zoning change, Mobilia told the commission that, according to chamber Executive Director Ed Musante, only 16 percent of Norwalk jobs are industrial.

Commission member Andrea Light was unconvinced.

Light said judging by the success of NordenPark's other tenants -- Gibbs College, radar manufacturer Norden Systems and tour travel company Tauck World Discovery -- she didn't see the need for the zoning change.

Commission member Patrick Shields said because the Conservation Commission had turned down the wetlands permit, Norden Place would have to come back with a new proposal.

By denying the project its wetlands permit, largely because of storm water drainage concerns, the Conservation Commission last month effectively killed the project as it is written.

Last week, Norden Place LLC filed an appeal of that decision in state Superior Court in Stamford, alleging it was made illegally.

Legal sources said the appeal could take 18 months or longer in the courts.

Shields described the zone change as a "stick" that could be used to sweeten the developer's offer.

"Hopefully, they will come back with a better proposal," he said.

After the meeting, Fowler said zoning decisions shouldn't be made by threat but by collaboration.

Shields, Light and Robert Keyes voted against the zone change; Mobilia, Karen Spencer and Robert Hard voted to approve.

Planning Commission Chairman Walter Briggs said he was disappointed by the vote.

He said he hoped Norden Place would return with another plan.

Copyright © 2006, Southern Connecticut Newspapers, Inc.

_________________________________________________________________________________

June 6, 2006

 

Advocate

Firm appeals NordenPark condo rejection

By John Nickerson
Staff Writer

June 6, 2006

NORWALK -- The developer trying to build 273 residential units at NordenPark is appealing the Conservation Commission's rejection of its application.

The appeal, filed in state Superior Court in Stamford by Norden Place LLC, states the commission acted illegally in denying a wetlands permit for the condominium project.

The city's Zoning Commission is scheduled to decide whether the proposed 38-acre site of industrial-zoned land can be used for multifamily housing.

The panel also is scheduled to decide whether it should approve a special permit for the development, proposed to be built along the Westport line and Interstate 95.

The six-page appeal said the developer was denied a fair hearing and the commission's decision unfairly diminishes the property's value.

The suit also said the commission made findings inconsistent and contrary to evidence and testimony presented at the public hearing.

City staff attorney Robert Maslan denied the allegations made in the suit and said the Conservation Commission's May 16 decision denying Norden Place a wetlands permit was "very defensible."

"The applicant and interested private parties had a fair opportunity to present evidence to the commission as regards the state statutes and local regulations regarding inland wetland applications," Maslan said.

Norden Place principal Clay Fowler declined to comment.

In its decision, the commission said Norden Place failed to ensure the proposed development would not significantly affect wetlands and watercourses.

According to commission consultants, the storm water management plan for the project would be able to handle the first inch of rainfall. But additional rain falling onto the property once the project is built, could harm wetlands.

When it rains more than an inch, "the proposed detention basins would not provide storage of runoff or provide any further water quality treatment," the commission ruled.

As a result, a large storm could significantly change how much water existing wetlands on the property would have to absorb.

Norden Place consultants disagreed, saying their plan would not significantly change the amount of water runoff the property now produces.

The commission's consultants said they could not verify the developer's claim without additional information.

The commission suggested Norden Place come up with a new application minimizing development within 50 feet of wetlands and watercourses. It also said that Norden Place should increase the capacity of its storm water management system to provide treatment when it rains more than an inch.

Copyright © 2006, Southern Connecticut Newspapers, Inc.

_________________________________________________________________________________

May 12, 2006

 

Advocate

State grows by keeping green


By Julie Fishman-Lapin
Staff Writer

May 12, 2006

Connecticut's economic future is intimately linked with its
environmental future, according to state Department of Environmental Protection
Commissioner Gina McCarthy.

Economic growth and the protection of natural resources are not separate missions -- those who shape both agendas must work together, McCarthy told area business leaders at the Stamford Marriott yesterday during a luncheon organized by The Business Council of Fairfield County

The quality of life and the health of state residents are at stake, as is the ability for business to flourish, she said.

The DEP, under McCarthy's leadership, will not be a regulatory agency that merely reacts to problems, she said. McCarthy, who was appointed DEP commissioner 18 months ago, is aggressively implementing programs and ideas to help shape Connecticut's long-term environmental future.

"We need to have an agenda," she said of her agency. "We need to be proactive. We need to insert ourselves at the table where decisions are being made,"

The role of environmental regulators has changed from the days of the 1960s and 1970s, when traditional, industrial sources of pollution pumped  black smoke into the air and toxic waste into rivers.

"These were big visible issues," she said. Today's environmental challenges are less conspicuous, but the consequences of ignoring them are just as devastating.

McCarthy said one of her primary focuses is the issue of urban sprawl, which she describes as "the greatest threat to the natural resources of this state."

She has launched the Landscape Stewardship program in an effort to influence land-use patterns in the state by providing support and environmental awareness training to local boards and commissions.

The goal, she said, isn't to take away a municipality's independence on land-use decisions. "It's getting them the support they need to think through their growth issues," McCarthy said.

One of the EPA's major efforts is to encourage revitalization of urban areas, which will keep new construction away from precious grasslands and open space, said McCarthy.

She has hired a brownfield redevelopment liaison for the DEP, and worked to revise regulations that block urban redevelopment.

A big concern, particularly for the lower Fairfield County region, is air quality. "Fairfield County is right in the middle of the worst air quality our state faces," she said.

Air pollution in this area comes from the traffic that clogs the roadways, and the air that floats into the region from New York City and New Jersey exacerbates the problem, she said.

A further complication is the region's quest to increase its energy supply. McCarthy said she will not tolerate harming the environment for the sake of bringing in more power.

"We are short on energy, but high on air pollution," said McCarthy, who congratulated the business council for its efforts in energy conservation. The council is spearheading the largest office building energy conservation initiative in the country.

"The work you are doing on energy efficiency is absolutely critical if we are going to make our way forward on this energy crisis," she said.

After McCarthy addressed the group, Christopher Bruhl, president and chief executive of the business council, said he was encouraged that the commissioner is concentrating on creating a common dialogue.

Environmental and energy concerns are interwoven, Bruhl said. "These are different parts of the same decision. They have to be approached together."

_________________________________________________________________________________

April 21, 2006

 

Hour

City again will target noisy, speeding drivers

By HAROLD F. COBIN

Hour Correspondent

NORWALK — As a follow-up to the weeklong "slow days" the city held last month, motorists will face a week of slow and quiet days beginning June 22, Mayor Richard A. Moccia told a neighborhood group Thursday night.

Moccia said police handed out around 400 tickets for a variety of violations during the week of increased traffic laws enforcement, and in June they'll be using decibel meters to make sure noise from engines and stereo systems don't exceed the city's noise ordinance.

Moccia said his only regret was that the city does not receive any of the money paid in fines for traffic violations. If it did, he said, the city could conduct weeklong slow and quiet days seven times a year, instead of four.

Moccia's announcement came in response to a question raised Thursday night during his appearance before a neighborhood group in the East Norwalk library. About 20 people attended the program, which was sponsored jointly by the East Norwalk Neighborhood Association and the East Norwalk Business Association.

Moccia said the city intends to hire "as many youths as we can find meaningful jobs for" this summer, with at least 150 being employed by city departments, social service agencies and local businesses.

He said about $100,000 has been raised to employ youths, and it may be necessary to dip into city funds to cover the cost of the hiring program. To save money, he said this summer the program will be managed by City Hall staff, instead of hiring an administrator.

The mayor added that with cutbacks in funds from the state and federal governments, the only way to operate such programs is to obtain funds and assistance from businesses, nonprofit agencies, volunteers and local government.

Stating "resource officers work," Moccia expressed confidence that the placement of specially trained police officers — called resource officers — in Norwalk and Brien McMahon high schools next year will "make kids feel safer and more confident." He emphasized the officers would not be there to arrest students.

Including the resource officers, Moccia said the city will have nine more police officers next year.

Responding to a question about the ability to evacuate East Norwalk in an emergency, Moccia said the city has a comprehensive emergency preparedness plan covering the first three days of an emergency.

"We want (the city) to be able to function for a minimum of three days," he said.

Moccia said plans to revitalize areas of the city with new housing, offices and retail space were necessary to limit increases in property taxes. He said new construction along West Avenue will turn it into a "city within a city," where residents "won't have to get into their cars to go somewhere."

Moccia said the boom in construction of condominiums would have a limited impact on the school population because the number of kids living in condominiums was only about one-fifth of those who reside in "normal housing."

Moccia said Norwalk ranks 41st in funds the state's municipalities receive from the state and federal governments. With 86 percent of the city's budget covered by property taxes, Moccia said, "We're just not getting our fair share of federal and state funds."

Asked what has surprised him the most after five months in office, Moccia said it was the number of people who come to City Hall each day wanting to see him. He said his desk was "like a bunny farm," because an hour after he clears it off, it's covered with papers again.

_________________________________________________________________________________

April 21, 2006

 

Hour

Zoning body OKs Rowayton lot restrictions

By ROBERT KOCH

Hour Staff Writer

NORWALK — A month after residents sounded off against large homes on small lots, the city's Zoning Commission has approved additional lot-coverage restrictions.

"(Residents) point to houses that already have been built that dwarf (neighboring) houses. We attempted to address the concern. We feel that this is a good starting point and we will study further the ramifications of height," said commission Chairwoman Dorothy Mobilia after approval of the restrictions Wednesday night. "The coverage on lots we think will address some of the worries of folks who live in these neighborhoods where these buildings are going up."

In B Residence zones, 35-percent maximum buildout is permitted on lots up to 6,250 square feet. For lots measuring 6,251 to 8,250 square feet, 35-percent coverage is allowed for the first 6,250 square feet, and 30-percent coverage will be allowed for lot area above that. On lots greater than 8,250 square feet, 35-percent buildout is permitted on the first 6,250 square feet, and 25-percent buildout will be permitted for square footage beyond that.

For instance, on an 8,250-square-foot lot in a B Residence zone, a building footprint may exceed no more than 2,787 square feet.

Similar sliding scales will apply to the C and D Residence zones, under the lot coverage restrictions approved by the Zoning Commission on Wednesday night.

About 100 people packed the Common Council chambers of City Hall last month during a public hearing on the proposed restrictions.

Rowayton Advocates for Zoning collected nearly 600 signatures from residents urging the commission to adopt the restrictions before Rowayton loses its "small village feel." The majority of the speakers at the hearing endorsed the restrictions.

"What this ... is trying to eliminate is the real monster houses," said Rowayton Advocates Co-chairwoman Julie Burton, reacting to the approval of the lot coverage restrictions this week. "This is a huge step in the right direction, and we would really like to see the height restrictions passed."

Commissioners postponed action on the proposed height restrictions.

Under existing regulations, pitched-roof midpoints may reach no higher than 35 feet. Under the proposed revisions, midpoint heights would be limited to 28 or 32 feet, depending upon the zone. Overall roof heights would be limited to 38 feet.

"At the committee level, they could not reach a consensus as to whether they should reduce the height," said Michael B. Greene, the city's planning and zoning director. "That's the issue before the commission: Should there be a limit and what it should be."

Greene said the Planning and Zoning Department drafted the additional height and lot coverage restrictions, after the Planning Commission raised the issue as part of its work on updating Norwalk's Master Plan of Conservation and Development. The update, slated for completion this year, will guide development for the next decade.

_________________________________________________________________________________

April 7, 2006

 

Hour

Committee pulls all fire station money

By ROBERT KOCH

Hour Staff Writer

NORWALK — The Common Council's Planning Committee on Thursday night recommended yanking from Norwalk's unfolding 2006-07 capital budget $1.72 million aimed at designing a new fire headquarters.

"I do not take (my) proposal to delete $1.7 million for the new central fire station lightly," said Matthew T. Miklave, committee chairman. "I am prepared to consider funding by special appropriation a study with respect to the new fire station."

"The concern that I have is the following: In order to fund this fire station, we are using all of our capital surplus money, $4.75 million. We're also using all of the funds generated from the sale of a key city asset — the Volk Fire station — $4.3 million," Miklave added.

In a vote along party lines — Democrats for, Republicans against — the committee passed Miklave's motion to remove the $1.72 million sought by Fire Chief Denis McCarthy and backed by Mayor Richard A. Moccia as part of a package of changes that removed $1.3 million from the mayor's recommended capital budget of $12.75 million. The council must adopt the budget this month.

"The resolution passed, so there's no money for any work," McCarthy said afterward. "I think that we've demonstrated that the (Volk station) is in deplorable condition. The cost of the (new) station will increase and the cost of the study is an added expense. I believe we made a convincing argument and offered a viable compromise."

At issue is whether the city should sell the Charles A. Volk Fire Station property at 121 Connecticut Ave. and build an estimated $14 million new headquarters at the site of the Fire Support Services Facility at 100 Fairfield Ave. — or follow through with a $4.1 million plan launched under former Mayor Alex Knopp to renovate both locations. Renovation costs since have climbed to $5.6 million.

Earlier this week, McCarthy indicated that $600,000 would suffice to launch design work and nail down the accuracy of the $14-million estimate. He planned to come back to the council in December and request the balance of the $1.72 million if the results of the design work merited further expenditures.

Thursday night's debate, however, demonstrated that council members are not unanimous about building a new fire headquarters.

Miklave, referring to the proposed new headquarters, said there is a difference between "can we afford it and do we need it." He said he remains unconvinced of the needs amid requests to fix roads, replace school technology, build a fire substation to serve the northern section of the city and other priorities.

Councilman Nicholas D. Kydes, a Republican on the committee, fired back with a raised voice.

"The point here is that the fire department's needs are the needs which are frankly your needs, my needs, everybody's needs. And that's the need of safety," Kydes said. "You're going to spend my tax dollars for another study that's going to procrastinate or postpone this project, which will cause me as a taxpayer another potentially 10 to 20 percent more in construction costs ... to protect the well-being of every citizen in this city."

McCarthy stood firmly by his request for a new headquarters.

"Significant elements of both buildings would go untouched. There would be no additional square footage added to the Volk station," said McCarthy referring to the earlier renovation plan. "Really, this was, 'What can you do for $4.1 million?'"

McCarthy said a new headquarters would allow his department to "do more with the resources I have. I think that it is a good plan for the city of Norwalk and that its a good plan for the Fire Department."

City Finance Director Thomas S. Hamilton said he believes the city can afford building the estimated $14 million headquarters based on changes that have occurred since last year.

Those changes include an appraisal of the Volk station property which puts its value at at least $4.2 million and a higher-than-anticipated growth in the city's capital fund balance. To build the headquarters, the city would now have to bond slightly more than $5 million, Hamilton has calculated.

In other changes recommended by Miklave to the capital budget, the committee restored $50,000 to fix a retaining wall along Perry Avenue, $80,000 to plan traffic-calming measures for Strawberry Hill Avenue and $250,000 for new computers at Norwalk High School and elsewhere.

The latter restoration brings technology funding close to the $875,000 requested by the school board and schools Superintendent Salvatore J. Corda.

_________________________________________________________________________________

March 29, 2006

 

Advocate

Reclaiming 'a wonderful way of life'

By John Nickerson
Staff Writer

March 29, 2006

NORWALK -- After two months of neighborhood organizing, Lexington Avenue homeowners Rafael Degro and Milargos Navarro are beginning to see improvements.

Parking rules on the once-neglected South Norwalk residential street are now more strictly enforced. Tickets have been written for littering and drinking in public, abandoned cars have been towed, and police are now seen walking the tree-lined beat instead of driving through it.

The city recently made a property owner near Ely Avenue erect a chain-link fence around a watery open pit where a house was torn down last year. And on Saturday, the neighborhood will hold a junk day, when residents can get rid of old furniture and appliances.

Degro, a handyman and father of five, and Navarro, a mother of two who runs Julie's restaurant in East Norwalk, said they helped start the new Lexington Avenue Neighborhood Association because they wanted something better for their kids.

During the past two months, Degro and Navarro have held five meetings attended by about 10 active members.

"Thirty years ago, Lexington Avenue was a beautiful place. We want to bring the neighborhood back to the way it was, a quiet neighborhood where everyone knows each other," Degro said.

Residents said the street had been plagued by drug dealing and gang activity, particularly after criminals were swept off South Main Street when the new police station opened in May. Lexington Avenue needed someone to watch over it.

In January, Cesar Ramirez, a community police officer with nearly 19 years on the force, began patrolling Lexington and Ely avenues when his beat changed.

One of the first things he did was seek out residents to organize the Lexington Avenue Neighborhood Association.

"While conducting a review of the district, I realized that to improve the quality of life in the community, we needed to empower an organization," Ramirez said.

Ramirez found Degro, Navarro and several others before calling a meeting in January at police headquarters attended by 16 people.

"They all agreed that it was time to put together an organization that would really care for the community," Ramirez said.

Degro and Navarro said they hope the neighborhood organization can turn back the clock on the street, whose faded charm is closely tied to its tightly spaced two-story homes that spill out onto Lexington Avenue.

Through the '40s, '50s and '60s, Lexington Avenue -- intersected by Lubrano, Olean, Kossuth, Austin, Snowden, Laura and Hemlock streets -- was an Italian and Hungarian enclave.

Ginger Sollazzo Raymond remembers when grocery stores and butcher shops dotted the residential street.

With a dozen or more cousins living around her when she was growing up on the street in the '50s and '60s, Raymond said, "It was a wonderful, wonderful way of life."

"They would have feasts and street parties. On saints days, we would parade on the street. It was like Little Italy in New York City," said Raymond, who owns Chatham Manor catering hall.

Degro and Navarro said they hope that after years of neglect, Lexington Avenue will have street fairs and greeters to welcome new residents.

"I hope everyone comes out and takes action in the neighborhood," Degro said.

City Neighborhood Improvement Coordinator David Shockley said Degro and Navarro have been working hard to sign up volunteers for the neighborhood's Saturday trash pickup.

"They get to know one another and understand their concerns, and it makes a tighter neighborhood. We have seen this in other neighborhoods like Golden Hill," Shockley said. "They communicate more, and it makes a closer neighborhood."

"When they see us start to do something, they will come out and help us," Navarro said.

Residents of Lexington Avenue, Lubrano, Olean, Kossuth, Austin, Snowden, Laura and Hemlock streets who want to get rid of furniture, appliances and other bulky items should put them on the sidewalk Friday night. Department of Public Works will not accept items placed on the curb after 8 a.m. Saturday.

Residents must help load the trucks.

Other bulky waste cleanup days are scheduled for Woodward Avenue on April 8; Golden Hill neighborhood, April 22; West Main Street, April 29; South Main Street, May 13; and the Spring Hill neighborhood around Kendall School, June 3.

_________________________________________________________________________________

March 29, 2006

 

Hour

Public gets another crack at Norden Place plan

By PATRICK R. LINSEY

Hour Staff Writer

NORWALK — Members of the public will have their say next month on revised plans for the Norden Place housing development.

The Conservation Commission granted the developer's request to defer resumption of a public hearing on its proposed 328-unit housing development until April 11. Because the revised plans contain new information, the public can once again sound off, said Anne Cagnina, acting chairwoman of the commission.

Norden Place LLC requested an additional two weeks to prepare its rebuttal, to address concerns raised by the commission and members of the public Feb. 29. The commission deferred the developer's rebuttal period after its presentation and public comment ran until 11 p.m. Feb. 28.

The developer's attorneys acknowledged questions surrounding the development's density, intrusion into buffer areas and provisions for retention of stormwater runoff. The new plans will scale back development on the wooded, 38-acre property situated between NordenPark and the Westport border, attorneys said.

"These changes would include the elimination of (two mid-rise buildings) and replacement with townhouse product, thereby reducing overall density by approximately 50 units," wrote Frank N. Zullo, an attorney for the developer, in a letter to a commission staffer. The changes "will result in a lesser intrusion into the buffer areas and a reduction of overall coverage and parking requirements."

While the plans are still being modified, Norden Place hopes to submit its revisions to the commission by March 31, said Elizabeth Suchy, an attorney for the developer.

Norden Place, led by Spinnaker Real Estate Partners, LLC, needs the Conservation and Zoning commissions' assent to build multi-family housing on the land, now zoned for industrial purposes.

The Conservation Commission is charged with protecting Norwalk's inland wetlands and watercourses. The Norden property contains numerous wetlands.

In a letter to the Zoning Commission earlier this month, Cagnina lobbied for the removal of 11 acres of wetlands from the density calculation formula. That change would leave room for 240 units, likely still 38 short of the revised proposal to be offered by Norden Place.

GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. of Vernon, a consulting firm hired by the Conservation Commission, reviewed the developer's stormwater management and erosion control plans. While GZA said the engineering is sound, it requested information on 30 points within the drainage plan.

The city's Industrial Zones Committee endorsed the rezoning, provided 15 percent of the units qualify as affordable housing. Spinnaker has agreed to the request.

Commission members said they will need time to examine the new plans.

"There would be an understanding that should we ... need additional time, you will grant us an extension," Cagnina said.

An attorney for the developer said Norden Place would not oppose such an extension.

The public hearing will resume April 11 at City Hall in the Community Room.

Staff writer Patrick R. Linsey can be reached via e-mail at plinsey@thehour.com.

_________________________________________________________________________________

March 28, 2006

 

Hour

Developer requests push back on public hearing

By ROBERT KOCH

Hour Staff Writer

NORWALK — Norden Place LLC has asked the Conservation Commission to push back a public hearing on its proposed 328-unit housing development for the Norden site from tonight to next month, as it considers paring its plan by 50 units.

The public hearing, which began Feb. 28 and is set to resume tonight with a rebuttal from developer Norden Place, is now in the hands of commissioners.

"We haven't seen any changes to what they've proposed. We will open the continuation of the (Feb. 28) public hearing, and then we will vote on whether we want to continue to April 11," said Anne Cagnina, Conservation Commission acting chairwoman. "It would give (Norden Place) time to submit and for us to review whatever the changes would be."

Attorney Frank N. Zullo, who represents Norden Place, said the developer reviewed the report from the city's consultant and also comments heard at the earlier hearing. As a result, Norden Place has "been made aware of the following major areas of concern" over density, degree of intrusion into wetlands, and additional provision for stormwater runoff, wrote Zullo in a letter to Conservation Commission Senior Environmental Analyst Alexis Cherichetti.

"In a good faith effort to address these concerns, we are considering adjustments to our site plan. These changes would include the elimination of mid-rise buildings A-1 and C-1 and replacement with townhouse product, thereby reducing overall density by approximately 50 units," Zullo wrote.

The changes would result in the opportunity for on-site water detention, creation of additional areas for stormwater re-charge, less intrusion into buffer areas, and a reduction in overall coverage and parking requirements, Zullo wrote.

Norden Place, led by Spinnaker Real Estate Partners LLC, needs Conservation and Zoning commission approvals to build multi-family housing on the largely wooded, 38-acre parcel that lies between NordenPark and the Westport border. The land, now zoned for restricted industrial use, contains numerous wetlands.

The Conservation Commission hired GZA GeoEnvironmental Inc. of Vernon to review the stormwater management and erosion-control plans submitted by Norden Place. GZA found that "the engineering design appears to follow good engineering practices," but asked that the consultant provide additional information on 30 points within the Norden Place drainage plan.

Earlier this month, Cagnina wrote the Zoning Commission, urging removal of 11 acres of wetlands from the density calculation formula. For the Norden development, that would leave room for 240 units rather than the 328 units. A lower density residential use would be more desirable "because the environmental impacts are typically reduced," she wrote.

Norden Place has pitched the housing development as a means to offer a variety of housing types on land that likely will not be used for industrial purposes, given changing economic patterns. The city's Industrial Zones Committee has endorsed the requested rezoning provided that 15 percent of the resulting units be priced as affordable. Spinnaker Cos. has agreed.

"There are concerns about density," said Spinnaker Cos. principal Clayton H. Fowler. "We are looking at modifications to the plan in response to comments heard."

Zullo, in his letter to Cherichetti, wrote that Norden Place will try to complete the plan revisions and deliver them to the Conservation Commission office by March 31. He has asked that the revisions be treated as related to Norden Place's rebuttal rather than as new information for the commission.

_________________________________________________________________________________

March 26, 2006

 

Hour

Weston, Norwalk bombing link probed

By JAMES WALKER

Hour Staff Writer

WESTON —A father of two is being held on $1 million bond as a suspect in a bombing that exploded through Weston Friday night and might be a suspect in the "monstrous" bombing that ripped through Norwalk Friday afternoon.

The Weston Police Department arrested Bruce Forest, 49, of 10 Spring Valley Road, in the driveway of his home Friday night. He had attempted to run from police officers when he was seen driving away from the area in Weston where the explosion occurred.

Police found a loaded rifle in his vehicle and after conducting a search of his home, "seized numerous other weapons and thousands of rounds of ammunition and computers," said police chief Anthony Land.

Meanwhile, the Norwalk Police Department was in Weston Saturday and determined that Forest's car is the one eyewitnesses described leaving the scene of the Norwalk explosion, Land said.

Norwalk Police Chief Harry Rilling did not return calls by press time.

Forest was arrested at approximately 11 p.m. after Weston police received multiple calls of a loud explosion in the area of Georgetown Road and Samuelson Road, Land said.

The Redding Police Department also assisted in the arrest.

Land said Forest seemed "contrite" and was "cooperating" with the police investigation.

The police chief said he couldn't speculate as to why Forest allegedly set off the explosive in Weston.

The explosion in Weston caused damage to the rear of an unoccupied building that used to be the Midtown Service Station at 107 Georgetown Road.

The explosion in Norwalk occurred at the front left entrance of a vacant building at 73 Strawberry Hill Ave.

The building, the site of the former Norwalk Care & Rehabilitation Center, is boarded up and a popular hangout for youths. The explosion shook houses and knocked one man sitting in his living room out of his chair.

"He didn't put anything where anyone could get hurt," Land said.

The explosion closed down Georgetown Road in Weston for hours as members of the Connecticut State Police Bomb Squad collected evidence and checked the area for additional explosive material.

Eyewitnesses had described the suspect in the Norwalk bombing as a white or Hispanic man, approximately 5 feet 10 inches tall, approximately 27 years old and wearing sunglasses.

He was seen leaving the scene in a silver BMW.

Land said Forest had been under police radar for more than two weeks. Weston police have been working with Redding police, the Aquarian Police Department, the Connecticut State Police Fire Marshal office and the FBI on a series of explosions that began in October, 2005, Land said.

"We learned a lot about him," he said.

Land said the explosions last year destroyed a number of portable toilets located on the Aquarian Bridgeport property adjacent to the Saugatuck reservoir.

He said Forest is a suspect in those bombing and police expect to make additional charges against him.

Calls to Forest's home went unanswered.

Forest is currently charged with the manufacture of bombs, use of a firearm in the commission of a felony, unlawful discharge of a firearm, possession of a dangerous weapon, use of a firearm in the commission of a felony, second-degree criminal trespass, second-degree reckless endangerment, third-degree arson, second-degree criminal mischief and speeding.

He will appear Monday in Norwalk Superior Court.

Land termed the arrest and the investigation as police work performed in the "trenches."

"The cops did a great job," he said. "It was a great team effort."

Staff writer James S. Walker can be reached at (203) 354-1004 or jswalker@thehour.com

_________________________________________________________________________________

March 25, 2006

 

Hour

'Found' money brings road-repair fund to $4.5M

By ROBERT KOCH

Hour Staff Writer

NORWALK — The city may churn nearly $4.5 million into road repairs for fiscal year 2006-07, after public works officials located additional dollars this week.

"After having our Department of Public Works director review expenses for all road project accounts since 2002, it has now been determined that not all of the past budgeted money has been utilized," Mayor Richard A. Moccia said Friday.

Road repaving and reconstruction dollars now stand at $2.55 million in the city's unfolding 2006-07 capital budget. Director of Public Works Harold F. Alvord sought $4.89 million for roadwork for the fiscal year starting July 1.

Moccia said the review of road project accounts over the last four years has found $1.267 million leftover from fiscal year 2005-06 and an additional $659,000. He said the "found" money, although encumbered, can be used for 2006-07, as the projects for which the dollars were intended were completed under budget.

As a result, roads can be paved "without an additional strain" on the capital budget, and the city can maximize its paving program, Moccia said.

"Roads are a priority but so are the taxpayers' dollars, and by moving cautiously and reviewing all accounts, we are acting prudently," Moccia said.

Overall, the public works engineers have identified 38 streets for repaving or reconstruction for fiscal year 2006-07.

The Common Council earlier this month returned to its Finance Committee a Moccia-supported request to shift $100,000 from installing speed humps toward repaving East Avenue south of Interstate 95. The city last fall paved the south part of the busy north-south thoroughfare.

Democrats, who hold 10 of 15 council seats, asked Moccia and the city's finance director to look elsewhere for the repaving dollars, and leave the $100,000 intact for traffic calming. On Friday, Moccia indicated that may occur.

"We may just leave the (dollars) alone and use the money for other traffic-calming measures such as road striping," Moccia said. The council will decide, he said.

Douglas E. Hempstead, council minority leader, for years has pushed to boost capital budget funding for road repaving and reconstruction. In January, he praised Alvord's $4.89 million request. On Friday, he welcomed location of additional dollars.

"I am the happiest camper alive," Hempstead said.

The city must boost its annual expenditure for roads from $2 million to $5 million, if it is to stem the pace of their deterioration, according to Alvord.

_________________________________________________________________________________

March 25, 2006

 

Hour

Elderhouse may lose grant

By JAMES WALKER

Hour Staff Writer

NORWALK — A $500,000 grant awarded to Elderhouse by the state of Connecticut to expand its services for senior citizens might be tossed out the window because of a decision by the Zoning Board of Appeals Thursday night.

The board voted 4-1 to deny a request to grant seven variances to Elderhouse to construct a 2,400-square-foot addition to its building that sits on property owned by the First Congregational Church on the Green.

Variances, which allow an applicant to bypass zoning regulations, are granted when an applicant proves hardship and also proves there are no other options available.

The board denied the request without prejudice, which gives Elderhouse another opportunity to present its case.

Elderhouse wants to add a sunroom, library and four-season porch to help make the adult day care more relaxing and user-friendly for its clients.

The expansion would be built on "sloping, downhill property" abutting Lewis Way that is owned by the 1st Taxing District.

Denise Cesareo, executive director of Elderhouse, said the center has the full support of the church and the taxing district.

"Each gave us a little flexibility in the design," she said. "We thought we had proved our case."

ZBA chairman Anne Carbone was not available for comment, but commission member Gordon Tully disagrees with Cesareo's assessment of Elderhouse's presentation before the board.

"I don't think they were well prepared," he said. "There was no evidence of the attempts they made to develop other options."

Tully said the board is "200 percent" behind Elderhouse but "variances run with the property" and not the building that sits on the property.

Tully said Elderhouse's lease with the church expires in about 10 years, but Cesareo did not present evidence the church would enter into another long-term agreement. She also did not provide an opportunity for anyone from the taxing district to explain why the expansion couldn't be constructed on another piece of property owned by the district in a location near the one cited that would be a better fit.

"We didn't have a sense that they had done their due diligence," Tully said. "There was no point-by-point presentation of what they put into it or if they had exhausted all other options. We did not have the tools to allow us to help them."

Tully said to his knowledge the ZBA was not aware of a $500,000 grant. The board suggested a move to larger quarters or starting a second Elderhouse in a different location.

But Cesareo said the church gives Elderhouse "a favorable lease" and it would be impossible to find another location with the "ground space" they have with their current lease terms. She added moving would require additional monthly expenses that would have to be put toward overhead and not on services.

"It (the church lease) allows us to take care of people rather than pay overhead," she said. "I don't understand this. Elderhouse was built by this community for this community."

Elderhouse has been around for close to 30 years. It is the oldest free-standing adult day care center in Connecticut, which means it's not attached to a nursing facility.

The center gives families that take care of senior citizens a place where their loved ones are provided for during the day while they're off working or taking care of daily functions.

Elderhouse provides medical treatment, social interaction and helps seniors with their emotional, physical and nutritional needs.

About 70 percent of its clients have Alzheimer's disease; the rest have had strokes, heart attacks and Parkinson's disease and need assistance in some form with daily living activities.

The day care center provides for approximately 40 senior citizens a day. The expansion would allow the facility to serve an additional 20 seniors.

Cesareo said she is unsure what's next for Elderhouse but will discuss options with her attorney.

Meanwhile, Cesareo said she's committed to keeping Elderhouse at its present location but with baby boomers set to retire, the adult day care center must be ready to accommodate the growing number of city's senior citizens in need of services.

"We must be prepared for the years to come," she said. "We must do this for Norwalk."

_________________________________________________________________________________

March 25, 2006

 

Hour

Auto collision injures 2 men

         Hour 3-25-06 SHA crash and bomb.pdf

By HAROLD F. COBIN

Hour Correspondent

NORWALK — A city man was charged with reckless driving after a head-on collision on Strawberry Hill Avenue Thursday night police said he caused by losing control of his car and veering into the oncoming lane of traffic.

Police said Christopher Umpierre, 22, of County Street, was driving a Volkswagen Jetta south on Strawberry Hill Avenue near Scofield Street when he crossed into the northbound lane and collided with a 2005 Nissan Altima driven by a Milford man.

Umpierre and the other driver, 27-year-old Marvin Vasquez, were transported by ambulance to Norwalk Hospital. Umpierre was released following treatment. Hospital spokeswoman Maura Romaine said Vasquez was admitted and was listed in good condition Friday.

The accident was reported at 10:52 p.m. Umpierre's Jetta came to rest on its roof. A field of shattered debris from both cars lay fanned out across the road for a distance of at least 40 feet.

Police spokesman Robert Bardos said a report of the incident written by the investigating officer said Umpierre told him he was rounding a curve and felt his car lose control, possibly because of striking a pothole. The report said officers found no large potholes in the road.

Standing on his front lawn observing the accident scene, Strawberry Hill Avenue resident David Park said it was ironic the crash occurred during "Slow Down Days," during which police were strictly enforcing speed limits at various locations throughout the city. Next to Park was a handdrawn sign on his lawn that said, "SLOW DOWN," which he installed in support of the anti-speeding program.

Park said numerous car accidents have occurred near his home in the 21 years he's lived there, an observation confirmed by his next-door neighbor, Don Burns. Both pointed to spots in front of their homes where they said accidents had occurred.

Burns said that after hearing Thursday night's crash, he came out of his house and saw the driver of the Jetta getting out of the car by "crawling through the windshield." He said he thought the other driver was trapped in his car because he heard a lot of screaming.

After being charged, Umpierre was released on a promise to appear in court April 6.

_________________________________________________________________________________

March 25, 2006

 

Hour

Explosion rocks Norwalk neighborhood Police investigate abandoned building site

By LEE HIGGINS

Hour Staff Writer

NORWALK — City police are investigating to determine who set off an explosive device Friday at the front left entrance of a vacant building at 73 Strawberry Hill Ave., shaking nearby houses and knocking one neighbor out of a chair.

At about 3:57 p.m., Al Scofield, 63, who lives on Scofield Place, across the street from the building, heard a "very loud" explosion while sitting in his living room, he said.

"It managed to put me out of my chair," he said. "That's how bad the explosion was."

Within five seconds, Scofield rushed out into Scofield Place to find out what happened and saw a shiny silver BMW with fancy rims race past him with its trunk open at an estimated 50 mph. He said the driver stopped the car, exited, slammed the trunk closed, got back in and raced back down Scofield Place, heading north on Strawberry Hill Avenue.

Scofield described the man as a white or Hispanic, approximately 5 feet 10 inches tall, 27 years old and wearing sunglasses. He said it sounded like a case of dynamite exploded.

"It was monstrous," he said. "It really was. I'm not exaggerating ... That was something to feel it like that."

City firefighters, police officers and paramedics responded to the scene and the Stamford Police Department's bomb squad was called in to inspect the building.

Norwalk Police Chief Harry Rilling had no immediate comment. Alex Lametta, 16, was at his house on Strawberry Hill Avenue just down the street when he heard the explosion.

"There was this big explosion," he said. "A little bit of smoke. Really, really big rumble, shook my whole house. It was loud. It shook it like crazy, enough that my dad explained he thought it was an earthquake."

Elvie Funicello, 17, who lives on nearby Beacon Street, said her room started "rocking a little bit."

Rebecca Urban, 14, who lives on Woodland Court said her "whole house shook" and she went out and saw gray smoke toward the top of the building.

Mayor Richard A. Moccia, who also responded to the scene, said fortunately no one was hurt. The building, the site of the former Norwalk Care & Rehabilitation Center, is boarded up and is a popular hangout for youths, witnesses said.

It has been the site of previous criminal activity including an Aug. 5, 2005, arson.

_________________________________________________________________________________

March 17, 2006

 

Advocate

Municipal records can be hard to get

By Angela Carella
Assistant City Editor

March 17, 2006

Editor's note: Nationwide, this week is Sunshine Week, organized to combat government secrecy. All citizens have the right, by law, to know what government is doing. Yet, around the nation, laws that allow you information about government workings are being restricted or ignored. Each day this week The Advocate will publish a story about the public's right to know.

"With a deep sense of pride that the United States is an open society in which the people's right to know is cherished and guarded."

President Lyndon Johnson, signing Freedom of Information Act in 1966

Imagine your boss asks to see the sales report you're working on, and your response is that you have to check his driver's license before you give it to him.

Or it's none of his business.

Or that he read a newspaper to find out about it.

For municipal employees, the taxpayer is boss. Yet that is how some employees responded to requests for public records.

Over the last several days, The Advocate sent reporters to eight towns in lower Fairfield County to view records that are public under the Freedom of Information Act.

In each town, the reporter asked to see marriage license applications at the clerk's office, arrest logs at the police station, and teacher attendance records at the Board of Education.

The law is designed to preserve democracy by guarding against government secrecy. With a few exceptions, the records of a public agency are open. Citizens should expect to view just about any document the agency keeps.

All you do is ask

According to the law, citizens do not have to give their name, explain why they want to see a document or what they will do with it. They do not have to show a driver's license or other identification. They may be asked to write out their request, but only if they want a copy of the document.

Yet reporters who went to city and town halls to view public records -- they identified themselves as reporters only if they were asked -- in some cases were questioned, told to show identification and refused.

Public employees in Westport and Wilton did the best; those in Greenwich did the worst.

In lower Fairfield County, employees in the offices of city and town clerks appear to understand Freedom of Information law best. Seven of the eight offices turned over marriage license applications, with applicants' Social Security numbers blacked out as the law allows. In Greenwich, however, an employee told the reporter he could not see the applications and turned over a list of applicants' names instead.

Police and school offices often refused the requests or fulfilled them after imposing restrictions.

Too much paper?

In Stamford, an employee at police headquarters said she could not show the reporter the arrest log for the week because "that would use a lot of paper."

When the reporter said he just wanted to look at them, she asked him why. When he questioned whether he had to explain, she told him he did. Then she asked if he were a reporter. When he said yes, she asked to see identification. He showed it to her; then she refused to turn over the list of arrests.

"I fear sometimes that government officials think they own the records because they compiled them," said James Simon, director of the journalism program at Fairfield University. "They forget that they used taxpayers' money to do that, and taxpayers have the absolute right to look at them."

Stamford Mayor Dannel Malloy said city managers are trained once a year, and Stamford soon will designate someone in the law department to oversee Freedom of Information compliance.

Stamford Director of Legal Affairs Thomas Cassone said he or someone on his staff have seminars with members of boards and commissions when Freedom of Information issues arise, and city employees "have questions for us almost daily about what information they can release."

"I start every seminar by saying, 'Assume everything you do, everything you say and everything you write is public.' That's how the law is written," Cassone said.

As for the police department employee, "We'll look into it," Malloy said.

Schools still learning

Fairfield University sent journalism students on similar Freedom of Information surveys last year and in 1999. In those, Boards of Education did the poorest, Simon said.

"The people who work there don't seem to be as used to dealing with the public as the town clerk or police," Simon said. "But the state Freedom of Information office has put on endless workshops with school officials, so there really is no excuse for this."

Employees at the Stamford Board of Education fit the pattern. A reporter who asked to see the teacher absentee list for the week was asked who she was, why she wanted to see it, where she was from and what company she worked for.

The reporter said she thought it was public information, and the employee said the law requires that the request be put in a letter.

Not true, said Tracie Brown, principal attorney for the state Freedom of Information Commission in Hartford.

"If you simply want to inspect a document, you do not have to provide a letter," Brown said. "If you want a copy, they may ask for a letter but they don't have to. But under no circumstance do you have to provide the purpose for the request."

The Stamford Board of Education has trained administrators in Freedom of Information law, and it may be time to train the rest of the staff, Superintendent Joshua Starr said.

"Clearly there is a need to do it," Starr said. "The person may have thought she was protecting teachers' privacy, and we absolutely want to do that, but we also fully recognize we have to comply with the law, and we will make every effort to do so."

Taxpayers do not have to know why a teacher misses a day of school, but they are entitled to see the tally of absences, Simon said.

Teachers and other public employees "work for the taxpayers," he said. "The whole idea is not to discourage the public from viewing these things, but to encourage people to get involved in the process and make sure government is working effectively."

MYOB

At the Norwalk Board of Education, a reporter who requested the teacher absentee list was told, "I don't know if that's any of your business." Other employees told the reporter she probably couldn't see the list, asked who she was and why she wanted to see it and then said she couldn't have it because the office is under construction. One employee concluded by saying the reporter would have to get permission from the superintendent.

"She should have told the reporter to go to human resources for the information," Norwalk Superintendent Salvatore Corda said. "What that suggests to me is that I need to make it clear that people with requests should be directed to human resources."

It also suggests "we may need more training" in Freedom of Information law, Corda said. "In the public arena, the public is entitled to know."

At the Norwalk police department, an employee acknowledged that the arrest log is public information, but still asked the reporter why she wanted to see it before handing it over. Norwalk Mayor Richard Moccia said he will consider asking the city attorney's office to coordinate Freedom of Information training.

"I know based on legal memoranda I've seen that there have been procedures in place going back to my predecessors," Moccia said. "I think I have been open myself. That's the way it should be."

Greenwich First Selectman Jim Lash said he feels that way, too, but town employees rejected all three requests.

Besides the town clerk's office, where an employee turned over a list of marriage applicants' names rather than the applications, a desk sergeant at the Greenwich Police Department told the reporter who asked to see the list of arrests, "We don't have anything like that in this department to give to the public or to show them."

When the reporter asked the Board of Education to view the teacher attendance log, the assistant director of human resources told him he would have to make a written request to the director -- a violation of the law.

"I have no idea what they were thinking," Lash said. "My policy is that if people ask you for things, give it to them. It looks like (employees) aren't understanding it."

Greenwich had a training session with the Freedom of Information Commission in the last year, the town attorney briefs new members of boards and commissions, and handouts about the rules are distributed, Lash said.

Opening up

It can take time to change thinking, said Judy Neville, first selectwoman of New Canaan.

"We have had FOI training for all town employees and unions," said Neville, who's been in office 21Ú2 years. "It's very important that everyone understands it."

The New Canaan town clerk freely complied with the law, but when a reporter went to the police department and asked to see the arrest log, a woman told him they don't keep such records and recommended he read a newspaper.

"That one has me dumbfounded," Neville said. "I would think she was trained."

At the New Canaan Board of Education, an employee checked the reporter's driver's license, balked at his request to see the absentee records of all 400 town teachers, and asked if he would like to see one school. So he picked one. She handed him a printout of the list and stood over his shoulder as he read it.

New Canaan Superintendent David Abbey said the Board of Education did not participate in Neville's Freedom of Information training.

"What you might have to realize is we are in a security-conscious environment. We all wear badges in the schools," Abbey said. "The request was unusual and (the employee) probably got a little disoriented. If the person requesting the information identifies who they are and why they are here, it helps us feel more secure."

The law does not require that, said Brown, the Freedom of Information Commission attorney. "I would suggest that agencies not create more issues than they have to," she said.

The employee should not ask to see a driver's license, presumably to check whether the requester lives in the town.

"You can live anywhere in the world and go to a public agency in Connecticut and make a request for a public document and it should be complied with," Brown said. "The statute requires that agencies respond promptly to the request. Promptly has been defined as how soon the individual needs the information balanced against the workload of the agency staff. If the record is right there, let the person look at it. You don't get to ask if the request is legitimate."

Abbey said he thinks the employee complied with the law because she dropped what she was doing and showed the reporter the absentee log, even though it was for only one school. Still, "we have every intention of complying with the law," Abbey said. "We will follow up."

Why ask why?

In Darien, the town clerk's office freely complied with the request to see the marriage license applications. The police department also turned over the arrest log, though an employee in the communications department asked the reporter why he wanted to see it.

At the Darien Board of Education, an employee asked to see the reporter's driver's license, made him write down his request, sign it and provide his phone number. The next day, Friday, an administrator called the reporter to say he could view the attendance log. The reporter went on Monday and no one was there. Yesterday, the information was faxed to him.

Town Administrator John Crary said town employees are trained regularly in Freedom of Information law.

"My basic attitude is there is not much we have here that isn't open," Crary said.

As with other cities and towns in Fairfield County, Darien's Board of Education is overseen by the schools superintendent, not the mayor or first selectman.

Darien schools were not in session this week and Superintendent Don Fiftal could not be reached.

In Westport, First Selectman Gordon Joseloff, a former journalist, said town supervisors are trained in the law, memos are distributed and workshops are planned for all employees.

"I have a great interest in sunshine laws and want to make sure government is as open as it can be," said Joseloff, who took office in November. "I already have found occasions to remind employees of that."

The Westport town clerk's office complied immediately, the Board of Education took the reporter's name and number and called her back two hours later to say the records were ready, and the police department let her view the arrest log, even though an employee there first asked if she were a reporter or a private person.

Be reasonable

It's OK if public employees need a little time to gather the information, Brown said.

"You are entitled to inspect or get a copy of records during regular business hours," she said. "That's not to say the person behind the counter can't say, 'We are just getting ready to go into a staff meeting. Can you come back tomorrow?' We expect members of the public to be reasonable."

In Wilton, the town clerk and police department complied freely with the requests.

At the Board of Education, a woman first asked the reporter several times who he was and why he wanted to see the teacher absentee list. "Are you a parent, a teacher, a student?" Then her co-worker told her it was public information and she complied.

"My feeling is that employees are well-trained and try to comply," Wilton First Selectman William Brennan said.

But there are concerns about identity theft, and some searches are time-consuming and "onerous" for the town's limited staff, Brennan said.

Those things are true, but towns still must comply with the law, Brown said.

"People can get your Social Security number from many places," she said. "The public agency has to do what it has to do."

Weston refusal

In Weston, the town clerk turned over the marriage license applications on the spot. At the Board of Education, the reporter was told no one was there to help him with the records.

A communications person in the police department broke the law, asking the reporter why he wanted to see the arrest log. He said he just wanted to look at them and she told him that, without a reason, she could not allow that.

Town Administrator Tom Landry said town hall employees are trained in Freedom of Information law because many Weston residents request information.

The police department is run separately from the rest of town government. Weston Police Chief Anthony Land returned calls and left phone messages but could not be reached for comment.

-- Tomorrow, the Legislature is considering several bills that would amend the state Freedom of Information Act. Some would make public records more detailed and accessible, others would exempt information that now is public.
 _________________________________________________________________________________

March 12, 2006

 

Advocate

To help homeowners, four Norwalk neighborhoods seek special designation

By Lisa Chamoff
Staff Writer

March 12, 2006

NORWALK -- The Historical Commission is working to designate four distinctive city neighborhoods -- from Golden Hill, with its sprawling and fanciful Victorian homes, to the immigrant Whistleville section of South Norwalk -- as state historic districts.

State recognition would allow homeowners of old homes in these neighborhoods to qualify for tax credits for fixing up their properties, which preservationists hope will help save many of the properties from demolition.

In the Golden Hill neighborhood -- a former enclave for factory owners located on a bluff just south of Exit 14 off Interstate 95 -- 70 percent of the houses are 75 years old or more.

Kurt Schaaf, who lives in a circa-1860 house on Golden Hill Street, is hoping to take advantage of the designation to bring his place back to its old glory.

Schaaf, 60, bought the house for his parents when he was in his 20s, and moved in after they died a few years ago. The dwelling once served as the barn and carriage house for the main home across the street, built by the owners of a hat factory in South Norwalk.

"I'd like to do some work on the exterior, bring it up more to what it looked like historically," Schaaf said.

Schaaf started the work himself but couldn't continue due to physical problems. He has been trying to save money to hire workers. The tax breaks would be a great help, he said.

Jim Clark, president of the Golden Hill Association, said the group has been looking to start the process of being designated as a historic district, but coming up with the funds has been difficult.

"We're very grateful that we're part of this project," Clark said.

The work to recognize Golden Hill and Whistleville, as well as the Camp Street and West Main Street neighborhoods, sprang from a $30,000 federal Community Development Block Grant the Historical Commission received last year.

With the grant, it is creating a handbook to help owners of old homes receive tax credits for fixing up their properties. For property owners to take advantage of these credits, the building must be listed on a state or national Register of Historic Places.

Deborah Mathies, a commission member leading the project, said they chose four neighborhoods that fall under qualified U.S. Census tracts. To qualify for the tax credits, 70 percent of the families in the neighborhood must earn 80 percent or less of the $81,891 median state income for a family of four.

Stacey Vairo, a consultant hired by the historical commission to compile the information the state needs to approve the districts, has established the initial boundaries and is creating a catalog of buildings to be included.

With the exception of Golden Hill, which was initially a wealthy neighborhood and features some unique architecture and "high style" houses, the neighborhoods' homes were built for and by everyday residents, Vairo said.

What makes a neighborhood meaningful is the concentration of older buildings and the area's historical importance.

"I think what's most important is that these are historic neighborhoods and they develop in a very typical pattern," Vairo said.

For example, the collection of streets around the railroad tracks in South Norwalk was developed by the large population of Hungarian and Italian immigrants who came to the city in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The community was called Whistleville because of the sound the train made when it took a sharp turn nearby. Today, the area is largely Hispanic.

"It's so representative of the waves of immigrants that came in to Norwalk," Vairo said.

The imprint from those European settlers is still visible in the architecture and masonry of the dwelling and buildings. The Italians built social clubs and bocci courts, and the area had its own butcher shop and shoemaker, said John Kurtzman, who grew up in the area in the 1950s and is of Hungarian descent.

"What it did is it contained every industry that you would find in Europe at that time," Kurtzman said. "It was like a transplanted European community."

A total of 300 to 350 homes will be included in the Whistleville historic district. Its architectural styles are fairly simple, with Victorian elements and European stonework visible throughout.

As part of her research, Vairo also has been compiling a list of interesting architectural features. Of note in Golden Hill is a house on Elmwood Avenue with a "turntable" garage. Built before cars were able to go in reverse, the garage was designed so cars could circle around the garage to pull out.

Vairo said Golden Hill could qualify for the National Register of Historic Places.

She expects the districts to be listed with the state by the end of the year.

The designation would be welcomed by residents of Camp Street, who for the past several years have been dealing with the possibility of old homes being torn down on the street, just north of the city's downtown.

Ursula and Peter Schuerch have worked slowly on their Italianate-style house at 8 Camp St. since purchasing it in 1989. It was a labor of love for the two architectural designers, and they know how costly maintaining an old home can be.

"Certainly anything would have helped us, especially in the beginning," Ursula Schuerch said. "We didn't have a lot of money, but we had a lot of energy."

Camp Street is the smallest of the districts, with 56 houses and Union Cemetery likely to be included. Nearby, the West Main Street district will contain 150 to 200 homes.

Schuerch said though the neighborhood has changed, the historic district designation could help sustain it.

"I think anything that would help preserve what was here and help keep Norwalk special is a good thing," Schuerch said.

_________________________________________________________________________________

March 10, 2006

 

Hour

Norden Place hearing allowed little public discourse

To the Editor:

I went to school Monday night, March 6, to a public hearing scheduled by Norwalk Zoning Commission for public input on the proposed text amendment request that would bring multi-family residential housing to No. 8 Norden Place in Norwalk, currently a restricted industrial zone. I live in the neighborhood where the project stops just 90 feet away.

All sorts of legitimate public questions and concerns were to be voiced. Not so fast .... and here is where I went to school ...

I watched and learned how Attorney Frank Zullo set about to legally hijack the meeting away from the public and have it serve as a "glory forum" for the developer. Slicker than Fred Astaire's dancing, the Frank Zullo Tag Team waltzed out speaker after speaker, drone after drone from the Zullo Team, hovering by them as they spoke.

With an added twist, Zullo, in his version of Perry Mason, would interrupt and question his speaker and then re-cross, so to speak, so that the Zullo message was hammered home to commission members.

This is the same pattern he used last week to shut down the process of a public hearing scheduled by the Conservation Commission on the same proposal. All legal and very efficient stonewalling.

The March 6 Zoning Commission public hearing started at 7 p.m. Some three hours later, Zoning Commission members couldn't even start the public hearing portion.

Due to this Zullo Tag Team approach to monopolizing the clock, people were so worn out from the incessant talking and waiting, many needed to leave. As Zullo intended, his efforts undermined the intent and purpose of the public hearing. So much so that the Zoning Commission members could very well be cited for failure to handle their responsibilities in their capacity as appointed officials to serve the public.

The question is now who will rein in Zullo and who will undo all the damage he tried to inflict on those who did make statements; brushing aside everything said, discounting and dismissing any criticism and shortcomings with the No. 8 Norden Place proposal.

I call on the Zoning Commission to reconvene the public hearing and let the public speak on the No. 8 Norden Place text amendment proposal.

Carolanne Curry

Westport

_________________________________________________________________________________

March 10, 2006

 

Hour

Commissions review info on Norden Place development

By ROBERT KOCH

Hour Staff Writer

NORWALK — With one public hearing behind and another set to resume later this month, the city's Zoning and Conservation commissions are busy digesting information on Norden Place LLC's proposed 328-housing development for the eastern half of the Norden site.

Norden Place — a partnership led by Spinnaker Cos. — needs Zoning Commission approval to build multi-family housing on the 38-acre site between Norden Park and Westport. The area is now zoned for restricted industrial use.

Three additional acres lie on the Westport side, but all access — except for emergency vehicles — would be from Norden Place in Norwalk, according to Spinnaker.

On Monday night, the Zoning Commission closed its public hearing on the development. The same day, Conservation Commission Acting Chairwoman Anne Cagnina wrote Zoning commissioners, urging them to reduce the density of the proposed development.

The current density is 8 units per-acre. The Conservation Commission recommends removing 11 units of wetlands from the density calculation formula, in effect leaving room for 240 units rather than the 328 proposed by Norden Place.

"A lower density residential use would be more desirable than the currently proposed residential density because the environmental impacts are typically reduced," Cagnina wrote. "The higher density results in more impervious surfaces, a higher number of people using the land, a higher number of cars, more owners and more non-point source pollution risks — of particular concern on parcels with extensive natural resources, such as inland wetlands."

Frank N. Zullo, a Norwalk attorney representing Norden Place, has said 8 units per acre is one-third the density found in areas zoned for multi-family housing.

Spinnaker Cos., following the recommendations of the city's Industrial Zones Committee, has offered to price 15 percent of the resulting units as affordable.

Because the site contains numerous wetlands, the Conservation Commission, acting as the city's inland wetlands agency, must offer its recommendations to the Zoning Commission.

Michael B. Greene, city planning director, said the Conservation Commission wears two hats. He said Cagnina's letter, while important information, represents the comments of the Conservation Commission and not the comments of the Conservation Commission acting as the wetlands agency. The latter comments, needed by the Zoning Commission, are forthcoming.

On Feb. 28, the Conservation Commission opened its public hearing on the Norden development. The hearing is scheduled to resume March 28.

_________________________________________________________________________________

March 4, 2006

 

Hour

How to create cheaper housing

OpEd - click here

By William Collins

_________________________________________________________________________________

March 4, 2006

 

Advocate

East Norwalk cemetery loosens regulations on burials

By John Nickerson
Staff Writer

NORWALK -- For generations the East Norwalk Historical Cemetery, believed to be the city's oldest, has accepted the deceased on an invitation-only basis.

At more than 350 years old, the cramped 1.76-acre resting place for more than 1,100 bodies has been open to only those who can prove that family already reside there and space is available in established family plots.

That policy is about to change.

Prompted by younger board members, the cemetery's governing association is creating more than 100 plots to inter cremated remains around a planned 12-foot granite monument. These plots, unlike the traditional ones, are likely to be open to East Norwalk residents.

The East Norwalk Historical Cemetery Association will erect the monument with space for more than 100 new names, said Christopher Burr, who recently completed his first year as association president.

"This monument will be installed as soon as the ground thaws," said Burr, who is guaranteed a final resting place in the traditional headstone area of the cemetery by virtue of blood relations with no fewer than five founding families: Betts, St. John, Selleck, Hill and Fitch.

Burr's sixth great-grandfather, Gov. Thomas Fitch, and fifth great-grandfather, Col. Thomas Fitch of legendary Yankee Doodle fame, are buried in the cemetery on lower East Avenue. He said the family-only restriction was put in place generations ago to save space.

With fewer than 100 full-sized grave sites left in the cemetery -- most all of those are inaccessible to grave digging machinery -- burials all but stopped over past several decades.

Burr and association member Terry Rooney said a policy has yet to be approved that stipulates who will be eligible to be buried in the new area. But the two said they believe it will be open to East Norwalk residents.

"There are people who have lived in East Norwalk for 30 years and want to stay in East Norwalk forever, but they can't get in because they don't have any ancestors," Burr said. "The people of East Norwalk own the place, so we want to let them in."

"I think it is a good idea," said Rooney, an eight-year member of the association and executive director of the East Norwalk Improvement Association. "Once people find out that we are going to open it up we will get more people that will want to take advantage of it."

The earliest legible gravestone in the cemetery belongs to Rev. Thomas Hanford, who died in 1693. But because the grave yard adjoins the city's earliest settlement, Burr believes that pioneer Richard Seymour, whose 1655 death has the distinction of being the earliest recorded in Norwalk's settlement history, is buried there.

Initially, graves in the cemetery were cared for by the family survivors.

Because early grave markers usually consisted of a wooden cross or a rock, which have long since disappeared, Burr said there is a good chance that there are more than the 1,100 registered graves in the cemetery.

In 1843, the Down Town Cemetery Association was incorporated to care for and manage the cemetery. Ninety years later the name was changed to the East Norwalk Cemetery Association, Burr said.

After decades of dwindling perpetual care donations, the Third Taxing District took title to the property in 1966 because it was better able to procure insurance for the grave yard.

A year ago, the East Norwalk Historical Cemetery Association was formally designated by the district as the cemetery's burial authority.

The granite monolith will be erected on the east side of the park near where Emerson Street intersects the cemetery. The first urn, holding the remains of longtime East Norwalk resident Gloria Cromwell, was interred at the site last summer in one of the two-square-foot plots.

The association, which is funded by the interest generated by a irrevocable trust, spent just more than $22,000 for the monument, Burr said.

The final cost for new plots is yet to be determined. Burr and Rooney said the cost of the monument, name placement and perpetual care needs will go into figuring the cost for each cremation plot.

Individual headstones for the crematory urns will not be permitted.

"Our concern is not only the space, but it is ancient burial ground and we don't want to allow separate markers because we don't want to change the appearance of the cemetery," Burr said.

With word leaking out about the grave yard becoming more inclusive, the association has been hearing from interested parties.

So far, there have been three applications during the past 18 months.
_________________________________________________________________________________

Hour

February 10,2006

Norden plan increases affordable units

By ROBERT KOCH

Hour Staff Writer

NORWALK — Following a city recommendation, Spinnaker Cos. has boosted the percentage of affordable housing units within its proposed 316-unit development for the eastern half of the Norden property.

"We are doing the 15 percent recommended by the Industrial Zones Committee," said Spinnaker principal Clayton H. Fowler, leaving City Hall Thursday night after further review of the proposed development by Zoning commissioners. "We would fit (studio apartments) in the mid-rise buildings."

Norden Place LLC — a joint venture of Spinnaker Real Estate Partners LLC, Greenfield Partners and Summit Development — needs Zoning commission approval to build housing between NordenPark and the Norwalk-Westport border. The site now is zoned for Restricted Industrial Use and not multi-family housing.
 

The development calls for the units to be built in "villages" on the eastern half of the 78.6-acre Norden site, which lies between Norden Place, the Westport border, Interstate 95 and the Metro-North railroad tracks. Traffic would enter from Norden Place. Allowing emergency vehicles to enter via Hiawatha Lane in Westport is under consideration.

The Industrial Zones Committee last month approved a draft report recommending allowing multi-family housing on the Norden site and requiring that 15 percent of the resulting units be priced affordably. That's roughly four-dozen units, assuming that 316 units are built.

Fowler said changing floor plans — not adding square footage — allowed Spinnaker to boost the portion of affordable units from 12 percent to 15 percent. Fowler said 10 percent of the affordable units would target individual or families earning 80 percent of the state median income; the remaining 5 percent would be available to those earning up to 60 percent of the state median income. Within the latter group would be about a dozen studio apartments, he said.

That would leave condominiums priced at $239,000 for the 80-percent group and $178,000 for the 60-percent group; market-priced units would run about $500,000.

"We've lost a city council member in Norwalk because of affordable housing," said Zoning Commissioner David A. Watts, referring to District B Councilwoman Leona Williams' move to Bridgeport last year. "We're losing revenue. We're losing a lot of good employees, and they're taking their kids with them."

The shift to 15 percent affordable housing comes as the Zoning and Conservation commissions continue their review of the Norden development. The Zoning Commission has scheduled a public hearing for March 6 in the concert auditorium of City Hall. An independent consultant is expected to deliver its wetlands impact report to the Conservation Commission by Feb. 21.

Residents blasted the development as a potential traffic nightmare during a presentation by Spinnaker Cos. at the East Norwalk Library Jan. 31. Stress on municipal services and public schools was another concern.

On Thursday night, Donald Klepper-Smith, chief economist with DataCore Partners LLC, gave Zoning commissioners projected school enrollment, municipal services costs and projected tax revenue from the Norden development. The figures, he said, anticipate the uppermost "measure of municipal services."

"We calculated a maximum of 107 students," Klepper-Smith said. "I doubt very very seriously that you're going to see 107 students."

Klepper-Smith predicted the actual number of Norden Place children attending the public school system will be less than 107, based on some families relocating within Norwalk, and others sending their children to private schools.

Robert Hard, zoning commissioner, said families relocating in Norwalk is not a "net wash." More housing will result in more people and more students, he said.

"What would be the impact of having age restrictions?" Hard asked. "If it were to be a requirement, would it be a deal breaker?"

Answered Fowler: "Yes, it would."

Fowler said the development was designed to include a variety of housing types. While Spinnaker Cos. officials do not expect that families with children will be the main residents of Norden Place, Fowler added that some units will house families and that "our community needs to remain vital by having kids in school."

Klepper-Smith projected the cost per pupil to be $12,179. That includes dollars received through the state's Education Cost Sharing formula. He said the development would yield $13.9 million in tax revenue over a five-year period.

Andrea Light questioned how Klepper-Smith arrived at the $13.9 million figure. She and other commissioners received a summary of Klepper-Smith's 100-page report. He promised to provide them background materials supporting the numbers.

In another request, Light asked for confirmation by the Department of Public Works that the Norden Place development will not strain the city's wastewater treatment plant.

_________________________________________________________________________________

Advocate

February 4,2006

NordenPark plan hearing delayed

By Ryan Jockers
Staff Writer

February 4, 2006

NORWALK -- A public hearing for a major condominium project has been rescheduled to give the city more time to hire a consultant to review the plan.

The developer of the proposed 316-unit site at NordenPark will pay for the consultant based on a new law the Conservation Commission adopted and recently used for the first time.

The commission voted unanimously to impose the technical review fee on Jan. 10, but as of yesterday had not hired a firm to conduct it.

The city got bids from two firms by the due date, Jan. 29, but has not picked one because it did not have the developer's fee money to pay for the consultant, officials said.

The review is expected to take two weeks, and was supposed to be done by Feb. 14, the next commission public hearing on the plan.

But with the date approaching and a firm not chosen, the applicant, NordenPlace LLC, agreed to move the public hearing to Feb. 28, said Alexis Cherichetti, the city's senior environmental officer.

Cherichetti said yesterday she expected the city to have the funds to hire a firm by early next week.

Representatives for the developer said they were not opposed to paying the technical review fee, and that it is done in other municipalities.

Gerald Foley, the city's purchasing officer, said the city should revise the process in the future so it can hire a firm and then get reimbursed by the applicant.

The two firms that bid on the project are GZA GeoEnvironmental, which has an office in Vernon, and Eastern Ecology, of New York.

GZA bid $11,500; Eastern Ecology, $13,830, Foley said.

The commission added the technical review fee after amending regulations last year. A state law allows wetlands agencies to charge fees "sufficient to cover the reasonable cost of reviewing and acting" on applications, which has been interpreted to mean the cost of hiring outside assistance.

Conservation Commission members said expert help is needed to review a project as big as the housing plan. It would create three condo villages on a 41-acre parcel between Metro-North Railroad tracks and Interstate 95. _________________________________________________________________________________

Advocate

February 1,2006

Cuts sought in capital budget

By John Nickerson
Staff Writer

February 1, 2006

NORWALK -- Finance Director Thomas Hamilton yesterday recommended a $12.5 million capital budget, trimming $17.7 million from the $30.2 million in requests by department heads.

The recommendation is nearly 24 percent increase in capital spending over this fiscal year, and includes funds to design a new central fire station and begin upgrading infrastructure.

But the proposal also continues the policy of the past three years of holding down the amount of capital spending paid for through general obligation bonds in order to continue to finance the city's school reconstruction project, Hamilton said.

The amount of new debt that would be bonded and paid for through property taxes would be $5.2 million, Hamilton said.

The Planning Commission will hold a 7 p.m. hearing today in City Hall on the budget. The Planning Commission will make recommendations next month on the capital budget for the fiscal year that begins July 1.

The Fire Department is one of the big winners in the proposed capital budget. Hamilton recommends funding a controversial $1.7 million request by fire Chief Denis McCarthy to design a new fire headquarters and tear down the Charles A. Volk Central Fire Station on Connecticut Avenue.

Mayor Richard Moccia said last night that the money may not be spent if an evaluation of a newly proposed $14 million fire station at the former Wheels bus barn on Fairfield Avenue doesn't recommend that a new station be built.

"Everybody is making this a fait accompli that a new facility will be built. All we are trying to do is put the numbers together to see if we can make the Fairfield Avenue location work," Moccia said, adding that a hold has been put on all appropriations until the evaluation on a new building is done.

But there is no guarantee that the evaluation will be done before the Common Council votes on the capital budget, Moccia said.

Democratic Council President Michael Coffey, who crossed swords last week with the mayor on a $5,000 appropriation for an appraisal of the Volk station, said he believed the money could be better spent elsewhere.

"We have to determine what the priorities are for the city. Those of us in the Democratic caucus are dedicated to completing the school renovation project, and we he have to determine how much money we have to put into the upkeep of the roads in the city, which are in terrible shape," Coffey said.

Under Hamilton's budget, the Fire Department would also receive more than $500,000 for a new rescue vehicle and building repairs at other station houses.

Moccia agreed with Coffey that roads were an issue. The mayor pointed to Hamilton's recommendation that the city spend $2.55 million on road reconstruction and paving -- an amount which is $250,000 less than the Common Council allocated for roads last year.

In Hamilton's budget, the Department of Public Works would get the largest chunk -- $5.4 million. Public Works Director Harold Alvord requested $13.5 million.

In addition to road reconstruction and repaving, $100,000 would be spent for sidewalk and curb repair, $350,000 to repair the Perry Avenue Bridge over the Silvermine River and $350,000 to upgrade the city's storm water management infrastructure, among other items.

Alvord said he wasn't sure what to make of the recommendations until his staff reviews them over the next few days.

The Water Pollution Control Authority would only get $2.4 million of its $7.5 million request -- a request to begin funding an anticipated $39.5 million plant and sewer line upgrade.

Hamilton said that the city should wait for a WPCA consultant's long-range financial model before providing more money.

In his 10-page recommendation, Hamilton wrote that $5.2 million of the proposed $12.5 million capital budget would have to be bonded and repaid through annual property taxes.

The remainder would come from city revenue and $3.7 million would be withdrawn from the city's capital fund balance -- more than double the $1.75 million that was taken out of the fund to finance $10.1 million in capital expenditures this year.

Hamilton justified the nearly 24 percent capital spending increase: "It is short-sighted to allow vital city infrastructure to deteriorate or to fail to invest in projects that have a demonstrable economic payback or which promote the city's long-term economic vitality."

After seven hours of meetings with Hamilton over the past month, Moccia said: "I'm in total agreement. I think it is responsive to the needs of the city, but it also is responsible as far as taxes are concerned. . . .It strikes a good balance."

Over the past four years during the administration of former Mayor Alex Knopp, the finance manager's recommendations closely mirrored what the Common Council eventually approved.

But this year, with a Republican mayor and a Democrat-controlled Common Council, all bets may be off.

"I don't know what to expect," Moccia said. "I hope they accept what the finance manager says and what the mayor says."

Coffey said Hamilton's proposed budget might endanger the city's AAA bond rating, which allows Norwalk to borrow money at the lowest interest rates.

"I don't think it makes financial sense to extend ourselves to the point where we have no flexibility should any crisis or catastrophe arise. We should not do things that place the AAA bond rating on the verge," Coffey said.

Hamilton said bonding $5 million to $6 million over the next two years, with an increase to $8 million for the next five, would be the "maximum amount of additional debt the city can safely assume, while maintaining debt ratio benchmarks within the range acceptable to the bond rating agencies."

Parks and Recreation Director Mike Mocciae said he was pleased with Hamilton's decisions.

Hamilton said Mocciae should receive $710,000 of his $2.9 million request. Of that, $110,000 would be to improve lighting at Veterans Memorial Park; $250,000 would be allocated for a project to light the Brien McMahon baseball field; $100,000 would be to finish a renovation of the Calf Pasture Beach bathrooms and $100,000 would be spent to replace and add playground equipment to Veterans Memorial Park, Marvin School and Meadow Gardens.

Hamilton recommended $600,000, or about 70 percent, of the Board of Education's request for technology funding.

Hamilton recommended the library system receive less than half its request of $521,000. Hamilton's budget allocates $125,000 for a new entrance to the Main Library on Belden Avenue as well as $85,000 on new air conditioners and $26,000 for bathroom renovations.

Hamilton recommended allocating $295,000 of the Redevelopment Agency's request of $995,000. He recommended spending $175,000 for affordable housing and $120,000 for intersection improvements to make the Washington Street side of the Stroffolino Bridge more pedestrian-friendly. _________________________________________________________________________________

Advocate

February 1, 2006

Man found near tracks was killed by train, police say

By Matt Breslow
Staff Writer

February 1, 2006

NORWALK -- The death of a Stamford man whose naked body was found two months ago next to railroad tracks behind a strip club was ruled an accident.

Metropolitan Transportation Authority police believe Brandon Rizzi, a 1994 Westhill High School graduate, died after being struck by a train.

Rizzi, 29, died of multiple blunt traumatic injuries, according to the state medical examiner's office. The office listed multiple drug toxicity as another significant condition.

Rizzi was found dead Dec. 1, behind Mermaids Gentlemen's Club & Spirits. Police said they were told he had been drinking heavily, and a club employee said Rizzi locked himself in a bathroom at the Liberty Square club for a half-hour before the 1 a.m. closing. Another employee said Rizzi left wearing a sweatshirt, with his pants tied around his waist and a tank top on his head.

Shortly after Rizzi's death, police said his injuries were consistent with an accident. Blood found near the railroad tracks indicated Rizzi was struck by something on or very close to the tracks before tumbling down the north side of the railroad embankment, where his body was found.

MTA police yesterday said Rizzi's injuries were consistent with being struck by a train.

They believe Rizzi may have been walking too close to the tracks and may have been sideswiped. MTA police said it is believed Rizzi was struck by the train on the side of his body where he suffered a head injury and broken ribs.

The MTA yesterday said the investigation remains open pending police review of the toxicology results.

Vito Colucci -- a private detective working for Rizzi's family -- said the family is still offering a $15,000 reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of anyone responsible for Rizzi's death, despite the medical examiner's ruling it was accidental.

The family has requested a full autopsy report, Colucci said.

He said he wants to read the report and explain it to the family before commenting. _________________________________________________________________________________

The New York Times

January 30, 2006

New Laws Crack Down on Urban Paul Bunyans

By PATRICIA LEIGH BROWN

SAN FRANCISCO, Jan. 29 — As trees go, the pair of scraggly-looking Monterey cypresses sitting on a crest on Telegraph Hill are somewhat pitiful, even downright forlorn. But in a city where some movie stars bear wings, even ordinary trees can be transformed into a cause célèbre.

The trees are a favorite feeding spot and hawk lookout point for the now-famous wild parrots of Telegraph Hill (see the movie, read the book). In recent weeks, the removal of three adjoining trees by an absentee property owner and the resulting brouhaha — including the spectacle of the parrot author Mark Bittner throwing himself in front of a chain saw — prompted San Francisco officials to amend the city's Urban Forestry Ordinance to allow significant trees to be designated landmarks, including those on private property.

The amendment, which takes effect in February, treats trees much like historic buildings. It would place San Francisco squarely in a growing movement, from suburban Washington to Los Angeles, to protect mature urban trees — and in some communities, make it a crime to chop them down.

Once a cause for genteel women's clubs bent on beautification, the new get-tough stance on trees is largely a result of real estate. A study of three dozen cities using satellite imagery by the nonprofit group American Forests, completed two years ago, found that over the past 25 years, cities have lost up to 30 percent of their tree canopy to development.

San Francisco's tree canopy hovers at a slim 11.9 percent of the city's surface area, compared with New York's 21 percent and Washington's 28.6.

The loss of the so-called urban forest, said Deborah Gangloff, the group's executive director, is the result of sprawl, budget cuts and street widening, among other factors. The average city street tree lives 7 years compared with 60 years in a park and 150 years in a forest, the group's research shows.

"They're stuck in a concrete box, get bikes chained to them, with dogs relieving themselves and cars hitting them," Ms. Gangloff said. "They don't have room to grow because of power lines and sewer pipes. It's a hard life."

The avian drama in San Francisco follows a tree war that unfolded along the Potomac River in Montgomery County, Md. Last month, the Montgomery County planning board reached a settlement with the Washington Redskins' owner, Daniel M. Snyder, and his wife, Tanya, for clear-cutting some 130 view-obstructing dogwoods and other trees on their verdant riverfront estate.

The couple's neo-Georgian palazzo sits on land bounded by the C Chesapeake & Ohio Canal National Historic Park, which is run by the National Park Service. The county fined Mr. Snyder $37,000 for clear-cutting without a permit and ordered him to plant some 600 saplings. A spokesman for Mr. Snyder declined to comment.

Inspired by Mr. Snyder's Paul Bunyan move, the Montgomery County Council voted to triple the penalties for willfully violating the county's Forest Conservation Law and make it a criminal offense punishable by up to six months in jail.

"This problem is enormous and growing," said Howard A. Denis, a Republican Council member. "It's a quality of life issue. No one has the right to desecrate property and leave the county with a net loss of trees."

The tear-down phenomenon, in which trophy homes subsume suburban lots, has put new pressure on large "patriarch" trees, said Dave Docter, the managing arborist for Palo Alto, Calif. "Communities are scrambling to enact laws to mandate proper review," he said.

Named for a 1,000-year-old redwood, Palo Alto is a microcosm: in 1992, the demolition of a beloved Queen Anne Victorian and its surrounding oaks, planted in the 1920's on then-dirt streets, prompted an emergency oak-tree-cutting moratorium; six years later, spurred by the unprecedented demolition of older homes, the city expanded its tree ordinance to include private property.

The concerns are not just aesthetic: over the last decade, a host of studies have underscored the role of trees — especially mature ones — as "green infrastructure" that help reduce air-conditioning and energy costs, intercept storm water runoff, capture dust and other pollutants, curb the effect of greenhouse gases and increase property values. A study by the University of Washington even found that people shopped longer and more often in tree-lined retail areas and spent about 12 percent more money.

"Cities are beginning to recognize trees as capital assets just like roads, bridges and schools," said James R. Lyons, executive director of the Casey Trees Endowment Fund, a tree canopy restoration advocacy group based in Washington, and an under secretary of agriculture in the Clinton administration. "They're a significant investment that provides value to the city and residents. People don't think about them until they're gone."

A result, said Buck Abbey, an associate professor of landscape architecture at Louisiana State University, is "a kind of tree socialism" — a growing recognition "that a community's interest does not stop at the property line."

Professor Abbey has surveyed tree loss from Hurricane Katrina and written extensively on municipal tree ordinances. He said: "It's part of the recognition of community. The line between public and private property is not visible if a massive live oak is gone."

The tree wars seem likely to escalate along with stricter tree laws. In Los Angeles, for instance, the City Council is about to consider an amendment to the city's oak tree ordinance, which protects native oaks at least eight inches in diameter. The expanded ordinance would include three other species — black walnuts, California sycamores and bay laurels — and protect more trees by reducing the diameter of a landmark tree to four inches.

Most notably, violators could be charged with a misdemeanor and, in extreme cases, have their building permit withheld for up to 10 years. The ordinance, moreover, would require developers to get a permit to knock down protected trees and replace them with new trees at a ratio of at least 2 to 1.

Paula Bagasao, co-founder of Proh-LA, a group dedicated to protecting property rights on hillsides, especially vacant lots, called the ordinance "a backyard building moratorium" that would delay projects and add unnecessary costs. She finds the inclusion of black walnut trees particularly irksome.

"These nuts fall all over East L.A., sending up all this black stuff and giving birth to little walnut trees," she said. "The nuts fall on peoples' heads at parties. The walnut tree is not an endangered species."

The City of Charlotte, N.C., requires developers to preserve 10 percent of a subdivision's area in trees and also save all "heritage trees" approaching the size of those in the North Carolina state list of "champion trees." The state lost 1.2 million acres of urban forest between 1990 and 2002, nearly three-quarters of it because of urbanization, according to American Forests.

Mark Baldwin, executive vice president of the Home Builders' Association of Charlotte, said the policy "creates an inconvenience for the developer as far as density, but it certainly pays off in the price of the homes." The extra costs of "tree saves," he added, are passed on to the homeowner.

Here on Telegraph Hill, the ruckus over the parrots' cypress trees — leafy equivalents of the mansions of the stars — has underscored the somewhat precarious status of the city's trees. Despite its green, tree-hugger reputation, San Francisco, built partly on windswept sand dunes and deforested during the Gold Rush, has never been lush with trees. In contrast to New York, the majority of street trees here are not maintained or even planted by the city; it is up to individual property owners to plant trees.

The new ordinance would allow the Board of Supervisors to designate landmark trees anywhere in San Francisco, including those harboring significant wildlife. John Cowen, the property owner who cut the three cypress trees, said he felled them for safety and liability reasons.

"Everyone is freaked out about the urban canopy producing oxygen and habitat for this and that," Mr. Cowen said. "But these trees are rotten."

The skirmish between Mr. Cowen and Mr. Bittner, the author, and Judy Irving, the maker of the parrots film, became so fraught that Mayor Gavin Newsom sent his director of city greening, Marshall Foster, in as an intermediary.

Mr. Foster said that he had worked out a five-year plan to eventually replace the cypress trees with new ones, and that a community group had offered to subsidize pruning in the meantime. He conceded that the soap opera among the cypresses was a human one. "The parrots are oblivious," he said.

_________________________________________________________________________________

 

The Advocate

 

January 29, 2006

Facing housing boom, city focuses on potential woes

By Brian Lockhart
Staff Writer

January 29, 2006

NORWALK -- More than 2,000 apartments and condominiums have been proposed to be built across the city and officials are questioning whether the potential flood of new residents can be absorbed.

The Redevelopment Agency hired a consultant on Friday to determine the possible strain on schools, police and fire departments, sewage and garbage service.

RKG Associates Inc. of
New Hampshire will be paid $40,000 to perform a housing and retail market analysis for the next five and 10 years. The study will look at existing housing units, review plans for new developments and analyze trends and demographics.

A subsequent, $10,000 analysis will be awarded to estimate the fiscal effects associated with multi-family housing development on city services.

Redevelopment Director Timothy Sheehan said the goal is to "get a handle on the marketplace" and determine "when is enough, enough."

"Quite frankly, there have been a number of concerns expressed to me by public officials and general citizens about the housing units we're introducing to the urban corridors who want a better understanding as to what the overall absorption of those will be," Sheehan said.

Funding for the study was approved earlier this month at the same meeting where developer 95/7 Ventures proposed to halve the 1 million square feet of office space long planned for the Reed Putnam Urban Renewal project.

A recent Redevelopment Agency analysis of the office market bolsters 95/7 Ventures' position that it is not feasible to introduce 1 million square feet of office space. But some city officials who have been attached to the office plan for the past 20 years are cautious about replacing 60 percent of it with 335,000 square feet of housing, plus stores, a hotel and health club.

While looking at the entire city, RKG is also being asked to focus on the West Avenue and Riverwalk plans, and Sheehan said the findings will play a big part in determining whether officials embrace 95/7 Ventures' vision.

Clayton Fowler of Spinnaker Cos., 95/7 Ventures' controlling partner, said the study "will be important for all of us to move forward."

But, he added, "studies are studies. They aren't necessarily real life."

Douglas Adams, director of development for the Stanley M. Seligson Properties, called the analysis "important." Seligson has been working for several years, with three different city administrations, to develop a plan for new housing, retail and office space along West Avenue.

The company was not enthusiastic when 95/7 Ventures offered a new vision for Riverwalk.

"We have spent many years and many millions of dollars planning a project with the city based on a set of assumptions for all projects under the Redevelopment Agency," Jacobs said. "And we feel to change one now, this late in the game, dramatically impacts us and would be counterproductive to our project and the city."

Sheehan's hiring of RKG Associates, along with plans for the $10,000 housing study, also come at a time when the city revising its 10-year Master Plan of Conservation and Development.

Walter Briggs is chairman of the Planning Commission, which has the ultimate responsibility of crafting the master plan. He said he has spoken to Sheehan and intends to incorporate RKG's findings.

"It just makes my job a lot easier," Briggs said. "I'm thrilled he's doing it. It saves me a lot of time, trouble and money."

Copyright © 2006, Southern Connecticut Newspapers, Inc.

_________________________________________________________________________________

 

The Advocate

 

January 24, 2006

Panel urges city to relax rules on industrial land

By Brian Lockhart
Advocate Staff Writer

NORWALK -- A task force wants the city to loosen its zoning regulations to promote new commercial uses within most of its 200 industrial properties.

The draft recommendations unanimously approved yesterday by the Industrial Zones Committee also support a developer's plans for housing at the city's largest industrial property -- NordenPark -- but want a greater percentage of it to be moderately priced.

Earlier this month, NordenPark owners Spinnaker Cos., Greenfield Partners and Summit Development Co. offered to make 12 percent of the proposed 316 condominium units affordably priced to families earning less than 80 percent or 60 percent of the state median income.

But the Industrial Zones committee is pushing for 15 percent -- the same amount being requested by the Zoning Commission, which will have to grant a zoning change to allow housing at the 80-acre industrial site.

"We feel if you're taking industrial property off the rolls that would bring in jobs, you should provide housing for those who are here for jobs," said committee chairman Walter Briggs, who also heads the Planning Commission.

The 11-member task force was formed by former Mayor Alex Knopp in October 2004 to consider expanding uses at some industrial properties to stimulate economic activity. Members included city planning officials, business owners, industry representatives and residents.

Last winter and spring, the group heard testimony from Spinnaker officials and other industrial property owners, and the leaders of the Manufacturing Alliance of Connecticut and Connecticut Development Authority.

"We loosened it a little. Not greatly. There will be some people who are upset, but that's the way life is," Briggs said. "We're trying hard to make it work for everybody."

The recommendations cover two building zones: restricted industrial, which includes the Martin Luther King Jr. Drive neighborhood, a section of Woodward Avenue and NordenPark; and Industrial 1, which includes sites along Lexington and Wilson avenues and Day and Bouton streets in South Norwalk, Commerce and High streets in the city center, and properties in East Avenue along the train tracks.

Multifamily housing would be considered on a case-by-case basis on industrial properties of 10 acres or more.

Ten percent of housing units on parcels exceeding 25 acres would be required to be affordable to families earning less than 80 percent of the state median income, or $65,000 for a family of four. An additional 5 percent would have be set aside for families earning less than 60 percent of the state median income, or $49,000.

Out of the 200 properties within the city zoned for some sort of industry, five are larger than 10 acres. Only NordenPark exceeds 25 acres.

Kim Morque, a partner at Spinnaker Cos., attended yesterday morning's meeting of the Industrial Zones Committee.

"Their recommendations seem to be pretty balanced," Morque said. "I commend them for doing the work and taking a look at it."

For the past few years, Spinnaker has held up NordenPark as a prime example of what can be done to revive dormant industrial properties.

The developer purchased the Cold War-era industrial complex five years ago, including an existing, 660,000-square-foot building, from MetLife for $40 million.

The sole tenant was Norden Systems, which for 40 years built radar and other electronic systems for the military. It has downsized but remains on the premises.

Spinnaker found nonindustrial tenants such as Gibbs College, Tauck World Discovery travel company and baker Pepperidge Farm Inc. to fill the vacancies.

Morque said Spinnaker was not ruling out making 15 percent of its proposed condominium project affordable, per the industrial zones study.

"Certainly, it's still a work in progress, and we're addressing a number of questions and comments to the application, from land use to affordable housing, traffic, drainage," Morque said.

The Zoning Commission has scheduled a March 1 public hearing on the NordenPark housing. The Planning Commission also will review the proposal; the Conservation Commission will hold a Feb. 14 public hearing on Spinnaker's plan.

ENNA HOME